Fundamental Characteristics and Applicability of the RADAR Method: Proof of Ranking Consistency

This paper presents a mathematical explanation of one of the Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) methods—the Ranking based on Distance and Range (RADAR) method—along with its modified variant, RADAR II. Through mathematical proofs, the influence of each step of the method on the final ranking of alternatives is analyzed. The methods are tested on three numerical examples with varying criterion weights. The robustness of the methods, as well as their fundamental characteristics, is demonstrated. A comparative analysis reveals that although both methods prioritize alternatives based on their stability across all criteria—particularly the most important ones—the RADAR II method is somewhat more rigorous and stringent, whereas the original RADAR method is more flexible and yields more objective results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spectrum of Operational Research.
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31181/sor31202635
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Human auditory perception and evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fundamental Characteristics and Applicability of the RADAR Method: Proof of Ranking Consistency

Dragan Marinković, Nikola Komatina, Matej Babič
5 citations
Spectrum of Operational Research.
Human auditory perception and evaluation
24.97
article

Fundamental Characteristics and Applicability of the RADAR Method: Proof of Ranking Consistency

Dragan Marinković, Nikola Komatina, Matej Babič
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a mathematical explanation of one of the Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) methods—the Ranking based on Distance and Range (RADAR) method—along with its modified variant, RADAR II. Through mathematical proofs, the influence of each step of the method on the final ranking of alternatives is analyzed. The methods are tested on three numerical examples with varying criterion weights. The robustness of the methods, as well as their fundamental characteristics, is demonstrated. A comparative analysis reveals that although both methods prioritize alternatives based on their stability across all criteria—particularly the most important ones—the RADAR II method is somewhat more rigorous and stringent, whereas the original RADAR method is more flexible and yields more objective results.

Spectrum of Operational Research.Vol. 3(1)
University of Kragujevac (RS), Higher Education Centre Novo Mesto (SI), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Human auditory perception and evaluation
24.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.