Criminal Policy to Protect Public Office ،Comparative study

The majority of countries have been keen in their criminal legislation to provide criminal protection for the public office, represented by their employees, and to surround them with a stronger protection than the ordinary individuals, since the employee may be assaulted, insulted, threatened and prevented from performing their duty by ordinary people, which does not only affect themselves, but also extends to their jobs which they in charge of. Public job protection is not a privilege for employees, but rather a privilege for the public job, as the matter is related to public system, which is not permissible to discuss it, and Crimes committed against public office are not permissible for waiver or reconciliation, the victim’s absence at the trial does not lead to the case being dropped and the entity represented by the employee must appear on behalf of him at the trial to not make the job subjected by bargaining.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of AlMaarif University College
Published
2025-02-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51345/.v36i1.1024.g518
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminal Policy to Protect Public Office ،Comparative study

Hamdi Salih Majeed
Journal of AlMaarif University College
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

Criminal Policy to Protect Public Office ،Comparative study

Hamdi Salih Majeed
article en

Abstract

The majority of countries have been keen in their criminal legislation to provide criminal protection for the public office, represented by their employees, and to surround them with a stronger protection than the ordinary individuals, since the employee may be assaulted, insulted, threatened and prevented from performing their duty by ordinary people, which does not only affect themselves, but also extends to their jobs which they in charge of. Public job protection is not a privilege for employees, but rather a privilege for the public job, as the matter is related to public system, which is not permissible to discuss it, and Crimes committed against public office are not permissible for waiver or reconciliation, the victim’s absence at the trial does not lead to the case being dropped and the entity represented by the employee must appear on behalf of him at the trial to not make the job subjected by bargaining.

Journal of AlMaarif University CollegeVol. 36(1)
University of Al Maarif (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.