On the Ginzburg–Landau energy of corners

Abstract It is a well known fact that the geometry of a superconducting sample influences the distribution of the surface superconductivity for strong applied magnetic fields. For instance, the presence of corners induces geometric terms described through effective models in sector-like regions. We study the connection between two effective models for the offset of superconductivity and for surface superconductivity introduced in Bonnaillie-Noël and Fournais (2007 Rev. Math. Phys. 19 607–37) and Correggi and Giacomelli (2021 Calc. Var. PDE 60 236), respectively. We prove that the transition between the two models is continuous with respect to the magnetic field strength, and, as a byproduct, we deduce the existence of a minimizer at the threshold for both effective problems. Furthermore, as a consequence, we disprove a conjecture stated in Correggi and Giacomelli (2021 Calc. Var. PDE 60 236) concerning the dependence of the corner energy on the angle close to the threshold.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonlinearity
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/adc533
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Magnetism in coordination complexes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Ginzburg–Landau energy of corners

Michele Correggi, Ayman Kachmar, Emanuela L. Giacomelli
1 citations
Nonlinearity
Magnetism in coordination complexes
0.43
article

On the Ginzburg–Landau energy of corners

Michele Correggi, Ayman Kachmar, Emanuela L. Giacomelli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract It is a well known fact that the geometry of a superconducting sample influences the distribution of the surface superconductivity for strong applied magnetic fields. For instance, the presence of corners induces geometric terms described through effective models in sector-like regions. We study the connection between two effective models for the offset of superconductivity and for surface superconductivity introduced in Bonnaillie-Noël and Fournais (2007 Rev. Math. Phys. 19 607–37) and Correggi and Giacomelli (2021 Calc. Var. PDE 60 236), respectively. We prove that the transition between the two models is continuous with respect to the magnetic field strength, and, as a byproduct, we deduce the existence of a minimizer at the threshold for both effective problems. Furthermore, as a consequence, we disprove a conjecture stated in Correggi and Giacomelli (2021 Calc. Var. PDE 60 236) concerning the dependence of the corner energy on the angle close to the threshold.

NonlinearityVol. 38(4)
University of Milan (IT), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Magnetism in coordination complexes
0.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Ginzburg–Landau energy of corners — Michele Correggi, Ayman Kachmar, et al. · Nonlinearity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS