The impact of a cloud chamber demonstration on lay people’s conceptions of ionizing radiation

Abstract This study explored (mis)conceptions of ionizing radiation by using cloud chambers among four lay public groups: lower secondary school students, upper secondary school students, primary teacher students, and shopping mall customers. Ionizing radiation was most commonly associated with natural sources such as the Sun, as well as risks like cancer and nuclear accidents. However, widespread misconceptions were evident, including the belief that mobile phones are significant sources of ionizing radiation. Upper secondary school students perceived ionizing radiation as more harmful compared to the lower secondary school students. Shopping mall customers associated ionizing radiation with threats but did not consider it particularly harmful. With a cloud chamber demonstration primary teacher students and shopping mall customers gained insights into the prevalence of ionizing radiation and the relative harmlessness of background radiation, while upper secondary students did not report this takeaway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics Education
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/adc4aa
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of a cloud chamber demonstration on lay people’s conceptions of ionizing radiation

Mikko Laitinen, S. Manninen, Antti Lehtinen
Physics Education
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

The impact of a cloud chamber demonstration on lay people’s conceptions of ionizing radiation

Mikko Laitinen, S. Manninen, Antti Lehtinen
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study explored (mis)conceptions of ionizing radiation by using cloud chambers among four lay public groups: lower secondary school students, upper secondary school students, primary teacher students, and shopping mall customers. Ionizing radiation was most commonly associated with natural sources such as the Sun, as well as risks like cancer and nuclear accidents. However, widespread misconceptions were evident, including the belief that mobile phones are significant sources of ionizing radiation. Upper secondary school students perceived ionizing radiation as more harmful compared to the lower secondary school students. Shopping mall customers associated ionizing radiation with threats but did not consider it particularly harmful. With a cloud chamber demonstration primary teacher students and shopping mall customers gained insights into the prevalence of ionizing radiation and the relative harmlessness of background radiation, while upper secondary students did not report this takeaway.

Physics EducationVol. 60(3)
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of a cloud chamber demonstration on lay people’s conceptions of ionizing radiation — Mikko Laitinen, S. Manninen, et al. · Physics Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS