ANALYSIS OF CONSENSUS MECHANISMS IN BLOCKCHAIN SYSTEMS

This article provides an analysis of the primary consensus mechanisms employed in blockchain networks, namely Proof-of-Work (PoW), Proof-of-Stake (PoS), Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS), Proof-of-Authority (PoA), and Proof-of-Capacity (PoC).The study thoroughly describes the operational algorithms of each mechanism, examining their inherent advantages and disadvantages.It conducts a comparative analysis and offers tailored recommendations for the implementation of each consensus algorithm based on the specific challenges and objectives of blockchain systems.Furthermore, the work emphasizes how the individual parameters of these mechanisms influence the processes of block validation and generation.It explores the impact of these factors on the overall performance of blockchain networks, particularly in terms of security, decentralization, scalability, and energy efficiency.By integrating theoretical insights with practical considerations, this research aims to guide both practitioners and researchers in the selection and optimization of consensus protocols.It also lays the groundwork for future investigations into hybrid models that may combine the strengths of multiple consensus approaches to better address evolving security challenges and the increasing demands of decentralized applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Result Information Technologies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18413/2518-1092-2025-10-1-0-3
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ANALYSIS OF CONSENSUS MECHANISMS IN BLOCKCHAIN SYSTEMS

Игорь Николаевич Гарькин, Bulgakov V.D.
Research Result Information Technologies
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

ANALYSIS OF CONSENSUS MECHANISMS IN BLOCKCHAIN SYSTEMS

Игорь Николаевич Гарькин, Bulgakov V.D.
article en

Abstract

This article provides an analysis of the primary consensus mechanisms employed in blockchain networks, namely Proof-of-Work (PoW), Proof-of-Stake (PoS), Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS), Proof-of-Authority (PoA), and Proof-of-Capacity (PoC).The study thoroughly describes the operational algorithms of each mechanism, examining their inherent advantages and disadvantages.It conducts a comparative analysis and offers tailored recommendations for the implementation of each consensus algorithm based on the specific challenges and objectives of blockchain systems.Furthermore, the work emphasizes how the individual parameters of these mechanisms influence the processes of block validation and generation.It explores the impact of these factors on the overall performance of blockchain networks, particularly in terms of security, decentralization, scalability, and energy efficiency.By integrating theoretical insights with practical considerations, this research aims to guide both practitioners and researchers in the selection and optimization of consensus protocols.It also lays the groundwork for future investigations into hybrid models that may combine the strengths of multiple consensus approaches to better address evolving security challenges and the increasing demands of decentralized applications.

Research Result Information TechnologiesVol. 10(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ANALYSIS OF CONSENSUS MECHANISMS IN BLOCKCHAIN SYSTEMS — Игорь Николаевич Гарькин, Bulgakov V.D. · Research Result Information Technologies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS