Twelve principles for transformation-focused evaluation

There are growing calls for societies to transform towards regenerative futures that support the flourishing of life and transcend interlinked social and ecological crises. Many actors are now trying to identify whether desired transformations are occurring, and how different interventions are contributing to transformation. These are questions of evaluation . However, we lack a holistic appreciation of how evaluation can most effectively assist transformation efforts. We undertake a systematized scoping review of a large body of evaluation literature to identify principles and methodologies for transformation-focused evaluation. We identify twelve distinct but interdependent principles which, when applied by evaluators (and supported by evaluation commissioners, sponsors and funders), are considered to significantly enhance the effectiveness of evaluation in assessing and assisting transformations, although tensions exist between some of the principles. The principles were clustered into three overarching themes of Complexity Principles (how evaluation approaches complex systems), Power Principles (evaluators’ power relations), and Purpose Principles (evaluation’s deeper purpose and values). The Complexity Principles call for transformation-focused evaluators to appreciate evaluands (e.g., a transition initiative, sector, or region) as unique, entangled, nested, dynamic and uncertain systems, and employ more diverse, developmental, contextually adapted and future-sensitive evaluation approaches. The Power Principles urge evaluators to promote justice, embrace diverse and marginalized perspectives, and reduce evaluator-evaluand polarization by shifting power towards evaluation users, whilst also fostering a more autonomous evaluation profession and mutualistic partnerships of knowledge and action. Most fundamentally, the Purpose Principles advocate for a recentering of values, reflexivity and learning at the heart of evaluation practice, and ensure that the core purpose of evaluation is to support systemic, societal transformation towards regenerative futures. Relevant methodologies are suggested for operationalizing the principles. Transformation-focused evaluation is a radical shift from conventional practice but the urgency to address global crises makes the shift a crucial one.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000164
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Twelve principles for transformation-focused evaluation

Peter Ball, Zenda Ofir, Ioan Fazey, Barbara van Mierlo et al.
4 citations
PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
8.43
article

Twelve principles for transformation-focused evaluation

Peter Ball, Zenda Ofir, Ioan Fazey, Barbara van Mierlo, Sam J. Buckton, Graham Leicester, John Colvin, Kelly Parsons, Adam P. Hejnowicz, Glenn G. Page, Matthew Darby, Rebecca Newman
article en
4 citations

Abstract

There are growing calls for societies to transform towards regenerative futures that support the flourishing of life and transcend interlinked social and ecological crises. Many actors are now trying to identify whether desired transformations are occurring, and how different interventions are contributing to transformation. These are questions of evaluation . However, we lack a holistic appreciation of how evaluation can most effectively assist transformation efforts. We undertake a systematized scoping review of a large body of evaluation literature to identify principles and methodologies for transformation-focused evaluation. We identify twelve distinct but interdependent principles which, when applied by evaluators (and supported by evaluation commissioners, sponsors and funders), are considered to significantly enhance the effectiveness of evaluation in assessing and assisting transformations, although tensions exist between some of the principles. The principles were clustered into three overarching themes of Complexity Principles (how evaluation approaches complex systems), Power Principles (evaluators’ power relations), and Purpose Principles (evaluation’s deeper purpose and values). The Complexity Principles call for transformation-focused evaluators to appreciate evaluands (e.g., a transition initiative, sector, or region) as unique, entangled, nested, dynamic and uncertain systems, and employ more diverse, developmental, contextually adapted and future-sensitive evaluation approaches. The Power Principles urge evaluators to promote justice, embrace diverse and marginalized perspectives, and reduce evaluator-evaluand polarization by shifting power towards evaluation users, whilst also fostering a more autonomous evaluation profession and mutualistic partnerships of knowledge and action. Most fundamentally, the Purpose Principles advocate for a recentering of values, reflexivity and learning at the heart of evaluation practice, and ensure that the core purpose of evaluation is to support systemic, societal transformation towards regenerative futures. Relevant methodologies are suggested for operationalizing the principles. Transformation-focused evaluation is a radical shift from conventional practice but the urgency to address global crises makes the shift a crucial one.

PLOS Sustainability and TransformationVol. 4(4)
UK Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
8.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.