Incomplete reporting in randomized controlled trials of bovine respiratory disease vaccines in feedlot cattle

We evaluated bovine respiratory disease vaccine trials in feedlot cattle and found that most (19 of 34 [56%]) publications (describing 26 of 43 [60%] trials) labeled the control group as "unvaccinated" or similar terms even when all cattle in the trial received vaccine(s) at feedlot arrival. Additionally, 38 of 44 (86%) publications (describing 31 of 53 [58%] trials) reported statistical comparisons of bovine respiratory disease vaccines that did not mention the respiratory vaccines that all cattle received at feedlot arrival. Trial authors should report animal health products given to all cattle in a trial, in the abstract, methods, and results sections, to prevent misinterpretation of the actual comparisons investigated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.12.0389
Primary Topic
Microbial infections and disease research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incomplete reporting in randomized controlled trials of bovine respiratory disease vaccines in feedlot cattle

Sarah C. Totton, Jan M. Sargeant, Annette M. O’Connor
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Microbial infections and disease research
article

Incomplete reporting in randomized controlled trials of bovine respiratory disease vaccines in feedlot cattle

Sarah C. Totton, Jan M. Sargeant, Annette M. O’Connor
article en

Abstract

We evaluated bovine respiratory disease vaccine trials in feedlot cattle and found that most (19 of 34 [56%]) publications (describing 26 of 43 [60%] trials) labeled the control group as "unvaccinated" or similar terms even when all cattle in the trial received vaccine(s) at feedlot arrival. Additionally, 38 of 44 (86%) publications (describing 31 of 53 [58%] trials) reported statistical comparisons of bovine respiratory disease vaccines that did not mention the respiratory vaccines that all cattle received at feedlot arrival. Trial authors should report animal health products given to all cattle in a trial, in the abstract, methods, and results sections, to prevent misinterpretation of the actual comparisons investigated.

American Journal of Veterinary ResearchVol. 86(7)
University of Guelph (CA), Michigan State University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Microbial infections and disease research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Incomplete reporting in randomized controlled trials of bovine respiratory disease vaccines in feedlot cattle — Sarah C. Totton, Jan M. Sargeant, et al. · American Journal of Veterinary Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS