A Phase 1/2 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Nucleoside-Modified Messenger RNA Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Adults

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Circulating influenza strains antigenically differing from vaccine antigens increase disease burden by decreasing vaccine efficacy. Nucleoside-modified mRNA (modRNA) influenza vaccines may facilitate rapid production allowing later antigen selection and improved antigenic similarity compared to circulating strains. We studied different influenza modRNA vaccine (IRV) formulations and dose levels. <b>Methods:</b> This phase 1/2 randomized study evaluated IRV safety/tolerability and immunogenicity in healthy 18- through 85-year-olds. Based on safety and immunogenicity for different IRV doses, schedules, and valencies versus the quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV; Fluzone High-Dose Quadrivalent, Sanofi Pasteur) in phase 1 (65-85-year-olds), quadrivalent IRV (qIRV) was further evaluated in 65- through 85-year-olds and 18- through 64-year-olds in phase 2, leading to phase 3 dose selection. <b>Results:</b> Phase 1 (65-85-year-olds) safety/tolerability and immunogenicity findings supported qIRV 30-µg and 60-µg phase 2 assessment (18-85-year-olds, N = 610). qIRV was well tolerated. Injection site pain was the most frequently reported local reaction. Reactogenicity event incidences ≤ 7 days postvaccination for qIRV were generally higher versus QIV, observed more frequently in 18- through 64-year-olds than 65- through 85-year-olds, and showed dose-related trends (60 μg > 30 μg). qIRV and QIV adverse event profiles in 65- through 85-year-olds were similar. There were higher postvaccination hemagglutination inhibition assay geometric mean titers and fold rises and seroconversion rates observed with qIRV versus QIV for A strains, with no consistent pattern for B strains. Cell-mediated immune responses to qIRV by Day 7 showed overall higher T-cell responses against all strains versus QIV. Antibody and cell-mediated immune responses showed comparable trends across qIRV doses in 18- through 85-year-olds; a dose-related pattern was observed in 65- through 85-year-olds (60 μg > 30 μg). <b>Conclusions:</b> Phase 3 investigations of qIRV 60 µg in older adults and qIRV 30 µg in younger adults are warranted (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05052697).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13040383
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Phase 1/2 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Nucleoside-Modified Messenger RNA Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Adults

Angela R Branche, Agnieszka Zareba, Annaliesa S. Anderson, Orlando Puente et al.
5 citations
Vaccines
Influenza Virus Research Studies
6.77
article

A Phase 1/2 Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Nucleoside-Modified Messenger RNA Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Adults

Angela R Branche, Agnieszka Zareba, Annaliesa S. Anderson, Orlando Puente, Nicholas Kitchin, Kenneth Koury, Emily Gomme, Islamiat Oladipupo, Alok Maniar, Mark J. Mulligan, Ingrid L. Scully, Alejandra Gurtman, Graham Crowther, Kelly Lindert, Zhuobiao Yi, Pirada Suphaphiphat Allen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Circulating influenza strains antigenically differing from vaccine antigens increase disease burden by decreasing vaccine efficacy. Nucleoside-modified mRNA (modRNA) influenza vaccines may facilitate rapid production allowing later antigen selection and improved antigenic similarity compared to circulating strains. We studied different influenza modRNA vaccine (IRV) formulations and dose levels. <b>Methods:</b> This phase 1/2 randomized study evaluated IRV safety/tolerability and immunogenicity in healthy 18- through 85-year-olds. Based on safety and immunogenicity for different IRV doses, schedules, and valencies versus the quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV; Fluzone High-Dose Quadrivalent, Sanofi Pasteur) in phase 1 (65-85-year-olds), quadrivalent IRV (qIRV) was further evaluated in 65- through 85-year-olds and 18- through 64-year-olds in phase 2, leading to phase 3 dose selection. <b>Results:</b> Phase 1 (65-85-year-olds) safety/tolerability and immunogenicity findings supported qIRV 30-µg and 60-µg phase 2 assessment (18-85-year-olds, N = 610). qIRV was well tolerated. Injection site pain was the most frequently reported local reaction. Reactogenicity event incidences ≤ 7 days postvaccination for qIRV were generally higher versus QIV, observed more frequently in 18- through 64-year-olds than 65- through 85-year-olds, and showed dose-related trends (60 μg > 30 μg). qIRV and QIV adverse event profiles in 65- through 85-year-olds were similar. There were higher postvaccination hemagglutination inhibition assay geometric mean titers and fold rises and seroconversion rates observed with qIRV versus QIV for A strains, with no consistent pattern for B strains. Cell-mediated immune responses to qIRV by Day 7 showed overall higher T-cell responses against all strains versus QIV. Antibody and cell-mediated immune responses showed comparable trends across qIRV doses in 18- through 85-year-olds; a dose-related pattern was observed in 65- through 85-year-olds (60 μg > 30 μg). <b>Conclusions:</b> Phase 3 investigations of qIRV 60 µg in older adults and qIRV 30 µg in younger adults are warranted (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05052697).

VaccinesVol. 13(4)
Miami Dade College (US), Pfizer (United States) (US), Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Rochester (US), New York University (US)
Pfizer
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
6.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.