The condition of science, technology and innovation policy in Iran: a historical evolutionary perspective based on network governance

This paper analyses science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy making in Iran between 1990 and 2022 using the network governance approach. Four phases of STI policy are identified: human resources and publication boom, agencification era, comprehensiveness quest, and innovation turn. The analysis shows a low degree of decentralisation, good coordination, and successful interdisciplinary collaboration. However, challenges such as the pipeline model of innovation, performance measurement politics, and controversial government and university roles hinder policy reform. To create a national innovation system, a normative turn toward a broader societal definition of innovation is recommended, and the government should shift its role to facilitator rather than interventionist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Policy and Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtpm.2025.145505
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The condition of science, technology and innovation policy in Iran: a historical evolutionary perspective based on network governance

Mohammad Mahdi Zolfagharzadeh, Mehdi Mohammadi, Ali Zackery, Zohreh Karimmian
1 citations
International Journal of Technology Policy and Management
Economic and Technological Innovation
3.13
article

The condition of science, technology and innovation policy in Iran: a historical evolutionary perspective based on network governance

Mohammad Mahdi Zolfagharzadeh, Mehdi Mohammadi, Ali Zackery, Zohreh Karimmian
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper analyses science, technology, and innovation (STI) policy making in Iran between 1990 and 2022 using the network governance approach. Four phases of STI policy are identified: human resources and publication boom, agencification era, comprehensiveness quest, and innovation turn. The analysis shows a low degree of decentralisation, good coordination, and successful interdisciplinary collaboration. However, challenges such as the pipeline model of innovation, performance measurement politics, and controversial government and university roles hinder policy reform. To create a national innovation system, a normative turn toward a broader societal definition of innovation is recommended, and the government should shift its role to facilitator rather than interventionist.

International Journal of Technology Policy and ManagementVol. 25(1)
Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch (IR), Isfahan University of Technology (IR), University of Tehran (IR), University of Isfahan (IR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Economic and Technological Innovation
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The condition of science, technology and innovation policy in Iran: a historical evolutionary perspective based on network governance — Mohammad Mahdi Zolfagharzadeh, Mehdi Mohammadi, et al. · International Journal of Technology Policy and Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS