Predictive factors for the response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with stage II and III breast cancer

This study aimed to identify predictive factors for response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with stage II and III breast cancer. A cross-sectional study evaluated the medical records of 440 patients treated in the Oncology Department of a University Hospital in Brazil between 2007 and 2022. Response to neoadjuvant treatment was classified into three groups: pathological complete response (pCR), partial response, and no response. Predictive factors were analyzed using multinomial regression. Most patients showed partial response (73.9%). Patients aged 39 years or younger were three times more likely to achieve pCR [relative risk (RR) = 3.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51-6.15]. Conversely, patients with luminal A and B subtypes had a lower likelihood of pCR (RR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.04-0.18). The presence of diabetes (RR = 7.18, 95% CI: 2.43-21.1) and stage IIIB and IIIC (RR = 7.41, 95% CI: 1.48-37.0) increased the risk of no response by at least 7.4-fold. Besides age, molecular subtype, and staging, diabetes was significantly associated with the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, highlighting the importance of elucidating the mechanism by which diabetes may impair the response to neoadjuvant treatment, as well as the importance of prevention and management of diabetes before and during oncologic treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Cancer Prevention
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/cej.0000000000000967
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive factors for the response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with stage II and III breast cancer

Luana Patrícia Marmitt, Márcia Piccoli Fusieger Baratto, Antuani Rafael Baptistella, Diego de Carvalho et al.
European Journal of Cancer Prevention
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Predictive factors for the response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with stage II and III breast cancer

Luana Patrícia Marmitt, Márcia Piccoli Fusieger Baratto, Antuani Rafael Baptistella, Diego de Carvalho, Luciano Fiorentin, Shaline Ferla Baptistella, L Piovesan
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to identify predictive factors for response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with stage II and III breast cancer. A cross-sectional study evaluated the medical records of 440 patients treated in the Oncology Department of a University Hospital in Brazil between 2007 and 2022. Response to neoadjuvant treatment was classified into three groups: pathological complete response (pCR), partial response, and no response. Predictive factors were analyzed using multinomial regression. Most patients showed partial response (73.9%). Patients aged 39 years or younger were three times more likely to achieve pCR [relative risk (RR) = 3.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51-6.15]. Conversely, patients with luminal A and B subtypes had a lower likelihood of pCR (RR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.04-0.18). The presence of diabetes (RR = 7.18, 95% CI: 2.43-21.1) and stage IIIB and IIIC (RR = 7.41, 95% CI: 1.48-37.0) increased the risk of no response by at least 7.4-fold. Besides age, molecular subtype, and staging, diabetes was significantly associated with the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, highlighting the importance of elucidating the mechanism by which diabetes may impair the response to neoadjuvant treatment, as well as the importance of prevention and management of diabetes before and during oncologic treatment.

European Journal of Cancer PreventionVol. 35(2)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.