Racial and Sex Disparities in Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Neonatal Extracorporeal Life Support in the United States

The impact of race on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) availability, morbidity, and mortality remains poorly defined. We sought to define the impact of race/ethnicity, sex, and location on ECLS outcomes, and identify potential disparities that remain intact using a modern, inclusive cohort of neonates receiving ECLS in the United States. Data were extracted from the Children's Hospital Association Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database on neonates who received ECLS from January 1, 2010-December 31, 2020. Both adjusted and unadjusted regression models were fitted to study the association between neonatal ECLS outcomes and covariates. During the study period, 6,695 neonates from 47 hospitals met the inclusion criteria. Non-Hispanic White neonates (45%), males (57%), and hospitals in the Southern region (32%) compromised the largest proportions of ECLS cases and cardiac disease (44%) was the most common indication for ECLS. Hospital region was associated with ECLS duration with hospitals in the Midwest (median 6 days) and West (6 days) having significantly shorter courses than those in the Northeast (7 days) and South (7 days) ( p < 0.01). Associations between race/ethnicity, sex, hospital region, and mortality were detected. Non-Hispanic Black neonates (35% mortality), males (37%), and neonates in the Midwest region (34%) experienced lower ECLS mortality rates (all p < 0.05).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASAIO Journal
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002423
Primary Topic
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial and Sex Disparities in Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Neonatal Extracorporeal Life Support in the United States

Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Brian K. Stansfield, Laura E. Hollinger, Natalie E. Rintoul et al.
ASAIO Journal
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
article

Racial and Sex Disparities in Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Neonatal Extracorporeal Life Support in the United States

Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Brian K. Stansfield, Laura E. Hollinger, Natalie E. Rintoul, Heidi J. Steflik, Lizmarie Maldonado, L. Kyle Walker, Connor Kreese
article en

Abstract

The impact of race on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) availability, morbidity, and mortality remains poorly defined. We sought to define the impact of race/ethnicity, sex, and location on ECLS outcomes, and identify potential disparities that remain intact using a modern, inclusive cohort of neonates receiving ECLS in the United States. Data were extracted from the Children's Hospital Association Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database on neonates who received ECLS from January 1, 2010-December 31, 2020. Both adjusted and unadjusted regression models were fitted to study the association between neonatal ECLS outcomes and covariates. During the study period, 6,695 neonates from 47 hospitals met the inclusion criteria. Non-Hispanic White neonates (45%), males (57%), and hospitals in the Southern region (32%) compromised the largest proportions of ECLS cases and cardiac disease (44%) was the most common indication for ECLS. Hospital region was associated with ECLS duration with hospitals in the Midwest (median 6 days) and West (6 days) having significantly shorter courses than those in the Northeast (7 days) and South (7 days) ( p < 0.01). Associations between race/ethnicity, sex, hospital region, and mortality were detected. Non-Hispanic Black neonates (35% mortality), males (37%), and neonates in the Midwest region (34%) experienced lower ECLS mortality rates (all p < 0.05).

ASAIO JournalVol. 71(10)
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Augusta University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.