Enhancing Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Comparative Study of Intrathecal Midazolam and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine

Background: Spinal anesthesia is a critical technique for lower limb surgeries, offering rapid onset and reliability. However, the limited duration of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with bupivacaine presents a clinical challenge. This study investigates the efficacy of adding preservative-free midazolam to hyperbaric bupivacaine to enhance the analgesic profile of spinal anesthesia. Methods: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study involved 60 patients undergoing elective lower limb surgeries, divided into two groups. Group B received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, and Group B+M received the same dose of bupivacaine plus 0.2 ml (1 mg) preservative-free midazolam. The study assessed the onset and duration of sensory and motor block, the duration of postoperative analgesia, and the incidence of side effects. Results: There was no significant difference in demographic and baseline characteristics between the groups. However, Group B+M demonstrated a significantly longer duration of analgesia (218.5 ± 22.52 minutes) compared to Group B (171.5 ± 18.76 minutes) (p<0.001). The incidence of side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression showed no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: The addition of preservative-free midazolam to hyperbaric bupivacaine significantly extends the duration of analgesia without increasing the risk of major complications, suggesting a valuable enhancement to spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2487
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Comparative Study of Intrathecal Midazolam and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine

Mrunalini Alugolu, Mahmoud Ahmed, Jitendra Kumar, Khaliq Ahmed
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Enhancing Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Surgeries: A Comparative Study of Intrathecal Midazolam and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine

Mrunalini Alugolu, Mahmoud Ahmed, Jitendra Kumar, Khaliq Ahmed
article en

Abstract

Background: Spinal anesthesia is a critical technique for lower limb surgeries, offering rapid onset and reliability. However, the limited duration of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with bupivacaine presents a clinical challenge. This study investigates the efficacy of adding preservative-free midazolam to hyperbaric bupivacaine to enhance the analgesic profile of spinal anesthesia. Methods: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study involved 60 patients undergoing elective lower limb surgeries, divided into two groups. Group B received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, and Group B+M received the same dose of bupivacaine plus 0.2 ml (1 mg) preservative-free midazolam. The study assessed the onset and duration of sensory and motor block, the duration of postoperative analgesia, and the incidence of side effects. Results: There was no significant difference in demographic and baseline characteristics between the groups. However, Group B+M demonstrated a significantly longer duration of analgesia (218.5 ± 22.52 minutes) compared to Group B (171.5 ± 18.76 minutes) (p<0.001). The incidence of side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression showed no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: The addition of preservative-free midazolam to hyperbaric bupivacaine significantly extends the duration of analgesia without increasing the risk of major complications, suggesting a valuable enhancement to spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 14(8S)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.