The role of power and kinetic asymmetry in differentiating elite vs. sub-elite wheelchair rugby sprint performance

Wheelchair sprint performance varies by sports classification. Yet, it is unclear how spatio-temporal, kinetic and kinetic asymmetries of wheelchair sprinting differ among wheelchair rugby players of different performance standard. The study purpose was to examine the associations between 30s sprint performances and spatio-temporal, kinetic and kinetic asymmetries on a dual-roller ergometer in elite and sub-elite wheelchair rugby players (<i>n</i> = 20). Kinetic differences between groups were investigated using statistical parametric mapping. Peak velocities were associated with the acceleration phase and higher peak power (<i>r</i> = 0.62, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and lower push times (<i>r</i>=-0.50, <i>p</i> = 0.020). Greater distance travelled during the acceleration phase were correlated with lower asymmetries in peak power (<i>r</i>=-0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Overall, both peak velocity and total distance covered during the entire sprint was correlated with lower push times (<i>r</i>=-0.61, <i>p</i> = 0.003 and <i>r</i>=-0.62, <i>p</i> = 0.003) but greater peak power (<i>r</i>=-0.61, <i>p</i> = 0.003 and <i>r</i>=-0.62, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Elite players had lower power asymmetries between 1 to 15% and 95 to 100% of the push phase during the acceleration phase, accompanied by a lower initial contact asymmetry (<i>p</i> = 0.011). While power is an essential feature of sprinting, our findings show that how it is applied, in terms of asymmetry and coordination might differentiate the performance in wheelchair rugby.