Dynamic Minimum Service Level of Demand–Responsive Transit: A Prospect Theory Approach

Demand–responsive transit (DRT) provides flexible, user-centric services and is gaining attention as a solution to modern transportation challenges. Establishing a minimum service level is crucial for its effectiveness, yet existing methods rely on supplier-centric indicators that fail to reflect user psychology and the flexible nature of DRT. To address this, this study applied a prospect theory from behavioral economics and used logistic regression analysis of stated preference survey data to determine minimum service levels based on user perceptions. To account for regional variations, we classified user groups based on primary transportation mode, travel purpose, and age, proposing dynamic minimum service levels tailored to each group. Additionally, using the maximum likelihood estimation method, we estimated value function parameters for the prospect theory, allowing us to analyze users’ loss aversion and sensitivity to DRT services. The findings indicated that users would accept higher fares for DRT than for conventional public transportation, provided it offers shorter travel times. Sensitivity to service levels varied across user groups, highlighting the need for differentiated policies. This study provides insights to optimize DRT operations, improve user satisfaction, and guide policies that reflect regional and demographic characteristics, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of DRT services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073171
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Minimum Service Level of Demand–Responsive Transit: A Prospect Theory Approach

Jooyoung Kim, Ji-Hwan Kim, Sung‐Hee Lee, M. Jang
2 citations
Sustainability
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
1.37
article

Dynamic Minimum Service Level of Demand–Responsive Transit: A Prospect Theory Approach

Jooyoung Kim, Ji-Hwan Kim, Sung‐Hee Lee, M. Jang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Demand–responsive transit (DRT) provides flexible, user-centric services and is gaining attention as a solution to modern transportation challenges. Establishing a minimum service level is crucial for its effectiveness, yet existing methods rely on supplier-centric indicators that fail to reflect user psychology and the flexible nature of DRT. To address this, this study applied a prospect theory from behavioral economics and used logistic regression analysis of stated preference survey data to determine minimum service levels based on user perceptions. To account for regional variations, we classified user groups based on primary transportation mode, travel purpose, and age, proposing dynamic minimum service levels tailored to each group. Additionally, using the maximum likelihood estimation method, we estimated value function parameters for the prospect theory, allowing us to analyze users’ loss aversion and sensitivity to DRT services. The findings indicated that users would accept higher fares for DRT than for conventional public transportation, provided it offers shorter travel times. Sensitivity to service levels varied across user groups, highlighting the need for differentiated policies. This study provides insights to optimize DRT operations, improve user satisfaction, and guide policies that reflect regional and demographic characteristics, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of DRT services.

SustainabilityVol. 17(7)
Korea National University of Transportation (KR), Gyeonggi Research Institute (KR)
Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.