Considerable Variation in Intake of Live Food Microbes in Dutch Adults

<b>Background:</b> Diet is an important source of microbial exposure, potentially protecting against allergic disease. However, changes in dietary habits may have altered the intake of live food microbes. <b>Aim:</b> We quantitatively assessed the intake of live food microbes in Dutch adults and compared these estimates with those obtained from duplicate portions. <b>Methods:</b> In 34 Dutch adults (20-70 years), we estimated the food-microbial content of their diet for three dominant groups: total contaminating bacteria (TCB), lactic acid bacteria (LAB), and yeasts/moulds (YM). A food-microbial load database was compiled with minimum, best, and maximum estimated levels of these food microbes (in colony forming units (CFU)/g food). To estimate microbial intake, the amounts of food consumed (in grams) based on three 24 h dietary recalls were multiplied by the corresponding microbial content/gram of food. For validation, one 24 h duplicate portion per person was analysed for microbial content by conventional plate counting. We applied a one-way ANOVA to assess interindividual variation in microbial exposure, a two-way ANOVA to assess intraindividual variation in microbial intake, the so-called MOM2 analysis and regression analysis to identify foods contributing most to the level and variation of microbial intake, and Bland-Altman plots to assess the agreement between microbial intake estimated from 24-HDR and microbial counts determined in duplicate food samples. <b>Results:</b> The estimated total microbial exposure varied considerably across individuals (<i>p</i> < 0.05), ranging from 5.7 to 11.6 log (5.4 × 10<sup>5</sup>-4.4 × 10<sup>11</sup>) CFU/day. The exposure to TCB ranged from 2.5 to 11.4 log (3.0 × 10<sup>2</sup>-2.5 × 10<sup>11</sup>) CFU/day, LAB from 3.4 to 11.5 log (2.3 × 10<sup>3</sup>-3.0 × 10<sup>11</sup>), and YM from 2.6 to 9.6 log (3.6 × 10<sup>2</sup>-4.3 × 10<sup>9</sup>) CFU/day. Also, intraindividual exposure differed significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Estimates were confirmed by microbial analysis of 24 h duplicate foods, revealing total microbial levels of 6.4-11.0 log (2.8 × 10<sup>6</sup>-9.4 × 10<sup>10</sup>) CFU/day. On average, the best estimated total microbial exposure was 0.6 log CFU higher than values determined by plate counting of the duplicate foods. Foods responsible for the observed variation were identified. <b>Conclusions:</b> The intake of live food microbes among Dutch adults varied considerably, ranging from nearly a million to more than 100 billion cells per day. Further validation of the food-microbial database is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17071248
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considerable Variation in Intake of Live Food Microbes in Dutch Adults

Anastriyani Yulviatun, J.H.M. de Vries, M.H. Zwietering, Berber Vlieg‐Boerstra
1 citations
Nutrients
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
1.16
article

Considerable Variation in Intake of Live Food Microbes in Dutch Adults

Anastriyani Yulviatun, J.H.M. de Vries, M.H. Zwietering, Berber Vlieg‐Boerstra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Diet is an important source of microbial exposure, potentially protecting against allergic disease. However, changes in dietary habits may have altered the intake of live food microbes. <b>Aim:</b> We quantitatively assessed the intake of live food microbes in Dutch adults and compared these estimates with those obtained from duplicate portions. <b>Methods:</b> In 34 Dutch adults (20-70 years), we estimated the food-microbial content of their diet for three dominant groups: total contaminating bacteria (TCB), lactic acid bacteria (LAB), and yeasts/moulds (YM). A food-microbial load database was compiled with minimum, best, and maximum estimated levels of these food microbes (in colony forming units (CFU)/g food). To estimate microbial intake, the amounts of food consumed (in grams) based on three 24 h dietary recalls were multiplied by the corresponding microbial content/gram of food. For validation, one 24 h duplicate portion per person was analysed for microbial content by conventional plate counting. We applied a one-way ANOVA to assess interindividual variation in microbial exposure, a two-way ANOVA to assess intraindividual variation in microbial intake, the so-called MOM2 analysis and regression analysis to identify foods contributing most to the level and variation of microbial intake, and Bland-Altman plots to assess the agreement between microbial intake estimated from 24-HDR and microbial counts determined in duplicate food samples. <b>Results:</b> The estimated total microbial exposure varied considerably across individuals (<i>p</i> < 0.05), ranging from 5.7 to 11.6 log (5.4 × 10<sup>5</sup>-4.4 × 10<sup>11</sup>) CFU/day. The exposure to TCB ranged from 2.5 to 11.4 log (3.0 × 10<sup>2</sup>-2.5 × 10<sup>11</sup>) CFU/day, LAB from 3.4 to 11.5 log (2.3 × 10<sup>3</sup>-3.0 × 10<sup>11</sup>), and YM from 2.6 to 9.6 log (3.6 × 10<sup>2</sup>-4.3 × 10<sup>9</sup>) CFU/day. Also, intraindividual exposure differed significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Estimates were confirmed by microbial analysis of 24 h duplicate foods, revealing total microbial levels of 6.4-11.0 log (2.8 × 10<sup>6</sup>-9.4 × 10<sup>10</sup>) CFU/day. On average, the best estimated total microbial exposure was 0.6 log CFU higher than values determined by plate counting of the duplicate foods. Foods responsible for the observed variation were identified. <b>Conclusions:</b> The intake of live food microbes among Dutch adults varied considerably, ranging from nearly a million to more than 100 billion cells per day. Further validation of the food-microbial database is required.

NutrientsVol. 17(7)
Sebelas Maret University (ID), OLVG (NL), Rijnstate Hospital (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Probiotics and Fermented Foods
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.