Legitimate Exercise of the Right to Freedom of Expression or Unacceptable War Propaganda? The Prosecution of Verbal Crimes Related to the Russia’s War of Aggression against Ukraine

The Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has triggered a massive wave of criminal prosecutions for war-related offences, including verbal offences consisting in the denial or justification of certain conflict-related crimes. This paper shows that current international law requires states to criminalize and prosecute a limited range of verbal acts linked to conflict-related crimes, though this range is further expanded under the EU law. The paper also identifies the legal standards that states have to respect when criminalizing and prosecuting verbal acts linked to conflict-related crimes and uses the example of the Czech Republic to show how Member States may proceed and what challenges they face when seeking to abide by these standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze
Published
2025-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2025.1.03
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legitimate Exercise of the Right to Freedom of Expression or Unacceptable War Propaganda? The Prosecution of Verbal Crimes Related to the Russia’s War of Aggression against Ukraine

Veronika Bílková
Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze
International Law and Human Rights
article

Legitimate Exercise of the Right to Freedom of Expression or Unacceptable War Propaganda? The Prosecution of Verbal Crimes Related to the Russia’s War of Aggression against Ukraine

Veronika Bílková
article en

Abstract

The Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has triggered a massive wave of criminal prosecutions for war-related offences, including verbal offences consisting in the denial or justification of certain conflict-related crimes. This paper shows that current international law requires states to criminalize and prosecute a limited range of verbal acts linked to conflict-related crimes, though this range is further expanded under the EU law. The paper also identifies the legal standards that states have to respect when criminalizing and prosecuting verbal acts linked to conflict-related crimes and uses the example of the Czech Republic to show how Member States may proceed and what challenges they face when seeking to abide by these standards.

Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze(1(66)/2025)
Charles University (CZ)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.