Behavioural Biases in FinTech-Driven Investment Platforms: A Conceptual Exploration

Ultimately, digital investment platforms can be complex—human foibles tend to feature heavily in how decisions are made. This work probes how emotions like overconfidence and loss sensitivity, and even just following the crowd, are often tipping the scales, resulting in decisions that depart from what good, rational analysis might have recommended. Researchers pieced together everything they could find, ranging from user surveys and platform analytics to a handful of case studies; and what they discovered is pretty striking: these biases continue to emerge and wreak havoc with investment outcomes and people’s use of such platforms. And more often, it turns out, instead of making reasoned, logical decisions, intuitive feelings shape the decisions of the great majority of investors, who may end up steering themselves toward unwise choices. Notably, this ripple effect is not just limited to simple financial mechanics, as it also impacts health-related outlays—thereby affecting not just financial performance but also healthcare accessibility and patient outcomes. By marrying behavioural finance with technology, the study suggests a re-imagining of FinTech platform design with smarter nudges or tools for choice betterment. Overall, these findings suggest a need for better user education and strategically placed prompts that could help promote better financial habits and even increase economic resilience around healthcare.

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/eel.v15i2.2818
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavioural Biases in FinTech-Driven Investment Platforms: A Conceptual Exploration

FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Behavioural Biases in FinTech-Driven Investment Platforms: A Conceptual Exploration

article en

Abstract

Ultimately, digital investment platforms can be complex—human foibles tend to feature heavily in how decisions are made. This work probes how emotions like overconfidence and loss sensitivity, and even just following the crowd, are often tipping the scales, resulting in decisions that depart from what good, rational analysis might have recommended. Researchers pieced together everything they could find, ranging from user surveys and platform analytics to a handful of case studies; and what they discovered is pretty striking: these biases continue to emerge and wreak havoc with investment outcomes and people’s use of such platforms. And more often, it turns out, instead of making reasoned, logical decisions, intuitive feelings shape the decisions of the great majority of investors, who may end up steering themselves toward unwise choices. Notably, this ripple effect is not just limited to simple financial mechanics, as it also impacts health-related outlays—thereby affecting not just financial performance but also healthcare accessibility and patient outcomes. By marrying behavioural finance with technology, the study suggests a re-imagining of FinTech platform design with smarter nudges or tools for choice betterment. Overall, these findings suggest a need for better user education and strategically placed prompts that could help promote better financial habits and even increase economic resilience around healthcare.

Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.