The Basal Cell Carcinoma-One-Stop-Shop-Study

Background:The treatment of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) poses significant challenges due to the invasive, time-intensive and costly nature of margin mapping techniques such as Mohs micrographic surgery.[1][2] To address these limitations, we developed the "BCC-One-Stop-Shop-Method", integrating in-vivo and ex-vivo margin mapping using Line-field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography (LC-OCT).This method aims to streamline diagnosis, surgery and margin control process, allowing for completion within one patient visit.This study outlines the process, the results compared to histology and highlights its advantages in clinical practice.Methods: BCC lesions were marked using color-coded tattoo pens to delineate margins in four quadrants.Dermoscopic mosaic images were captured for AI-assisted colocalization, ensuring precise margin mapping.LC-OCT was used in-vivo to record videos along the marked margins with an integrated AI providing real-time BCC probability scores.Images of the center were taken by LC-OCT to assess depth and subtype.After excision, the tissue was placed in an ex-vivo setup, with the LC-OCT handheld adapted to a movable sample holder for imaging of the specimen.Videos and 3D stacks were recorded to confirm margin clearance.Then the tissue undergoes conventional histological processing for correlation with LC-OCT findings.Results: 50 BCCs of 43 patients were examined, 32 lesions also with ex-vivo LC-OCT.195 tissue quarters were evaluated and compared.38 lesions were located on the head (76 %), 7 on the trunk (14 %), 5 on the extremities (10 %).6 BCCs were superficial, 26 nodular, 14 infiltrative, 4 mixed subtypes and 1 was undefined.For in-vivo LC-OCT vs. histology sensitivity was 81.8 % (86.4 %), specificity 94.8 % (96.5 %) for the lesion (quarter) level.For ex-vivo LC-OCT vs. histology sensitivity was 71.4 % (86.6 %), specificity 96.0 % (96.4 %) for the lesion (quarter) level.Accuracy of overall performances for in-vivo for the lesion (quarter) level was 92 % (95.4 %), for ex-vivo 90.6 % (81.1 %).Conclusions: Our study presents a new approach for integrating advanced imaging technologies into BCC management, offering a comprehensive solution for preoperative margin mapping and intraoperative evaluation.Initial findings suggest this method is efficient, easy to implement, and well-accepted by patients.Further studies will confirm its efficacy and potential in BCC treatment, potentially reducing the psychological and economic burden associated with traditional methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EJC Skin Cancer
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcskn.2025.100324
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Basal Cell Carcinoma-One-Stop-Shop-Study

O. Mayer, S. Schuh, Mahmood S. Mozaffari, Sophia Schlingmann et al.
1 citations
EJC Skin Cancer
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
1.35
article

The Basal Cell Carcinoma-One-Stop-Shop-Study

O. Mayer, S. Schuh, Mahmood S. Mozaffari, Sophia Schlingmann, J. Welzel, E. Sattler, Maximilian Deußing, Hans‐Georg Wirsching, Kristina Fünfer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background:The treatment of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) poses significant challenges due to the invasive, time-intensive and costly nature of margin mapping techniques such as Mohs micrographic surgery.[1][2] To address these limitations, we developed the "BCC-One-Stop-Shop-Method", integrating in-vivo and ex-vivo margin mapping using Line-field Confocal Optical Coherence Tomography (LC-OCT).This method aims to streamline diagnosis, surgery and margin control process, allowing for completion within one patient visit.This study outlines the process, the results compared to histology and highlights its advantages in clinical practice.Methods: BCC lesions were marked using color-coded tattoo pens to delineate margins in four quadrants.Dermoscopic mosaic images were captured for AI-assisted colocalization, ensuring precise margin mapping.LC-OCT was used in-vivo to record videos along the marked margins with an integrated AI providing real-time BCC probability scores.Images of the center were taken by LC-OCT to assess depth and subtype.After excision, the tissue was placed in an ex-vivo setup, with the LC-OCT handheld adapted to a movable sample holder for imaging of the specimen.Videos and 3D stacks were recorded to confirm margin clearance.Then the tissue undergoes conventional histological processing for correlation with LC-OCT findings.Results: 50 BCCs of 43 patients were examined, 32 lesions also with ex-vivo LC-OCT.195 tissue quarters were evaluated and compared.38 lesions were located on the head (76 %), 7 on the trunk (14 %), 5 on the extremities (10 %).6 BCCs were superficial, 26 nodular, 14 infiltrative, 4 mixed subtypes and 1 was undefined.For in-vivo LC-OCT vs. histology sensitivity was 81.8 % (86.4 %), specificity 94.8 % (96.5 %) for the lesion (quarter) level.For ex-vivo LC-OCT vs. histology sensitivity was 71.4 % (86.6 %), specificity 96.0 % (96.4 %) for the lesion (quarter) level.Accuracy of overall performances for in-vivo for the lesion (quarter) level was 92 % (95.4 %), for ex-vivo 90.6 % (81.1 %).Conclusions: Our study presents a new approach for integrating advanced imaging technologies into BCC management, offering a comprehensive solution for preoperative margin mapping and intraoperative evaluation.Initial findings suggest this method is efficient, easy to implement, and well-accepted by patients.Further studies will confirm its efficacy and potential in BCC treatment, potentially reducing the psychological and economic burden associated with traditional methods.

EJC Skin CancerVol. 3
University Hospital Augsburg (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.