Esketamine nasal spray compassionate use program in the Netherlands: An open label, multi-center cohort study in severe treatment-resistant depression

• Intranasal esketamine is an effective augmentation strategy for severe depression. • Intranasal esketamine showed significant improvement after 28 days. • Level of treatment resistance did not influence esketamine efficacy. Esketamine, a N-methyl- d -aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, used intranasally (IN), is applied as an antidepressant (AD) in treatment-resistant depressed (TRD) patients. Real-world studies with IN esketamine are still scarce. To evaluate the effectiveness and potential moderators of response of IN esketamine in real-world TRD patients treated in a compassionate use program (CUP) in the Netherlands. In this multi-center, open label, naturalistic cohort-study 42 patients were treated with 28–84 mg IN esketamine augmenting an oral AD. We used the Montgomery-Asberg rating scale (MADRS) change scores as primary outcome and report response-, remission rates and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) reached after 28 and 90 days of treatment. Potential effect moderators studied were level of treatment resistance and history of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Baseline mean MADRS score was 33.6 ± 5.3 and 64.3 % of the population had a history of ≥5 failed AD treatments. At 28 days, a significant decrease of 10.1 (7.3–12.6) MADRS-points was observed (Cohen's d 1.9, 95 % CI: 0.26–0.45, t = 7.20, p < .001). Between 29 and 90 days no additional significant decrease in the MADRS score was observed. Response- and remission rates were 28.6 % and 14.3 % at 28 days and 35.7 % and 19.8 % at 90 days ( n = 42), respectively. At 28 days 52.4 % achieved MCID. No clinically relevant moderating effects were found. Small sample size and variable time between screening and start of treatment. In this group of TRD patients, IN esketamine treatment showed significant effectiveness, suggesting a valuable treatment option for this group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100905
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Esketamine nasal spray compassionate use program in the Netherlands: An open label, multi-center cohort study in severe treatment-resistant depression

Rob van den Brink, Joost Mertens, Emma Schmidt, Marasha de Jong et al.
3 links
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Treatment of Major Depression
article

Esketamine nasal spray compassionate use program in the Netherlands: An open label, multi-center cohort study in severe treatment-resistant depression

Rob van den Brink, Joost Mertens, Emma Schmidt, Marasha de Jong, Etienne Olivier, Harry Venema, Jasper B. Zantvoord, Sara Schutters, Koen Schruers, Martijn van Noorden, Dieuwertje de Waardt, Karin Foeken, Ji-Young Son, Daniëlle C. Cath, Henricus G. Ruhé, Abel Busz, Wessel Strootker
article en

Abstract

• Intranasal esketamine is an effective augmentation strategy for severe depression. • Intranasal esketamine showed significant improvement after 28 days. • Level of treatment resistance did not influence esketamine efficacy. Esketamine, a N-methyl- d -aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, used intranasally (IN), is applied as an antidepressant (AD) in treatment-resistant depressed (TRD) patients. Real-world studies with IN esketamine are still scarce. To evaluate the effectiveness and potential moderators of response of IN esketamine in real-world TRD patients treated in a compassionate use program (CUP) in the Netherlands. In this multi-center, open label, naturalistic cohort-study 42 patients were treated with 28–84 mg IN esketamine augmenting an oral AD. We used the Montgomery-Asberg rating scale (MADRS) change scores as primary outcome and report response-, remission rates and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) reached after 28 and 90 days of treatment. Potential effect moderators studied were level of treatment resistance and history of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Baseline mean MADRS score was 33.6 ± 5.3 and 64.3 % of the population had a history of ≥5 failed AD treatments. At 28 days, a significant decrease of 10.1 (7.3–12.6) MADRS-points was observed (Cohen's d 1.9, 95 % CI: 0.26–0.45, t = 7.20, p < .001). Between 29 and 90 days no additional significant decrease in the MADRS score was observed. Response- and remission rates were 28.6 % and 14.3 % at 28 days and 35.7 % and 19.8 % at 90 days ( n = 42), respectively. At 28 days 52.4 % achieved MCID. No clinically relevant moderating effects were found. Small sample size and variable time between screening and start of treatment. In this group of TRD patients, IN esketamine treatment showed significant effectiveness, suggesting a valuable treatment option for this group.

Journal of Affective Disorders ReportsVol. 20
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL), GGZ Drenthe (NL), Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL), GGZ inGeest (NL), Mondriaan GGZ (NL), Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Treatment of Major Depression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.