Validation of a Pulsatile Model for Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: NEFPAR Model

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy are the gold standard for treating small renal tumors. To improve training while adhering to animal welfare regulations, the NEFPAR pulsatile model was developed as a nonliving alternative for surgical simulation. This study aimed to validate NEFPAR as a realistic and effective training tool. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The NEFPAR model was constructed using porcine tissue used in other simulations, a pulsatile pump, and standard laparoscopic instruments. Eleven participants (4 urologists and 7 urology residents) were recruited for validation. They performed simulated laparoscopic partial nephrectomies using the model, and their performance was evaluated through a survey assessing the realism, educational impact, and comparison to other simulation models. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, with significance set at <i>P</i> < .05. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Most participants (72.7%) rated the NEFPAR model as realistic for key procedural steps, such as tumor resection and renal hilum dissection. The bleeding component was deemed essential for learning by 100% of participants. The NEFPAR model was superior to nonpulsatile animal models in replicating surgical bleeding and was comparable to cadaveric models in external appearance and tissue texture. However, cadaveric models were rated higher for replicating all procedural steps. No significant differences in responses were found between urologists and residents. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The NEFPAR model effectively simulates key aspects of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and offers an ethical, cost-effective alternative for surgical training. It was well-received for its educational value, especially for simulating surgical bleeding. Further refinements could enhance tissue consistency and tumor positioning, but the model has strong potential to be integrated into urology training programs to improve surgical skills and reduce reliance on animal models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0026
Primary Topic
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a Pulsatile Model for Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: NEFPAR Model

Santiago Sánchez Pardo, R. Ballestero Diego, J.A. Campos Sañudo
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
article

Validation of a Pulsatile Model for Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: NEFPAR Model

Santiago Sánchez Pardo, R. Ballestero Diego, J.A. Campos Sañudo
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy are the gold standard for treating small renal tumors. To improve training while adhering to animal welfare regulations, the NEFPAR pulsatile model was developed as a nonliving alternative for surgical simulation. This study aimed to validate NEFPAR as a realistic and effective training tool. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The NEFPAR model was constructed using porcine tissue used in other simulations, a pulsatile pump, and standard laparoscopic instruments. Eleven participants (4 urologists and 7 urology residents) were recruited for validation. They performed simulated laparoscopic partial nephrectomies using the model, and their performance was evaluated through a survey assessing the realism, educational impact, and comparison to other simulation models. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, with significance set at <i>P</i> < .05. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Most participants (72.7%) rated the NEFPAR model as realistic for key procedural steps, such as tumor resection and renal hilum dissection. The bleeding component was deemed essential for learning by 100% of participants. The NEFPAR model was superior to nonpulsatile animal models in replicating surgical bleeding and was comparable to cadaveric models in external appearance and tissue texture. However, cadaveric models were rated higher for replicating all procedural steps. No significant differences in responses were found between urologists and residents. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The NEFPAR model effectively simulates key aspects of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and offers an ethical, cost-effective alternative for surgical training. It was well-received for its educational value, especially for simulating surgical bleeding. Further refinements could enhance tissue consistency and tumor positioning, but the model has strong potential to be integrated into urology training programs to improve surgical skills and reduce reliance on animal models.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical TechniquesVol. 35(5)
Sulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges (SA), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES), Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.