Deterministic political competition and regional economic outcomes when the creative class sets tax policy

We analyze how deterministic political competition between the elites and the so-called creative class shapes economic outcomes in a stylized region. By deterministic, we mean a case where political power has shifted from the elites to the creative class with probability one. There are three groups in our region: workers, creative class members, and the elites. Unlike previous studies, tax policy in our region is set not by the elites but instead by the creative class. In this setting, we first present a counterintuitive result in which the creative class prefers to tax itself, and not the elites or the workers, with the tax proceeds being redistributed also to itself via lump-sum transfers. Second, we explain why this counterintuitive result makes sense. Finally, we discuss whether the above counterintuitive result will hold if the proceeds of taxation are redistributed using lump-sum transfers to all the groups in our region and not just to the creative class.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Science Policy & Practice
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rspp.2025.100198
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deterministic political competition and regional economic outcomes when the creative class sets tax policy

Hamid Beladi, Amitrajeet A. Batabyal
1 citations
Regional Science Policy & Practice
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
3.13
article

Deterministic political competition and regional economic outcomes when the creative class sets tax policy

Hamid Beladi, Amitrajeet A. Batabyal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We analyze how deterministic political competition between the elites and the so-called creative class shapes economic outcomes in a stylized region. By deterministic, we mean a case where political power has shifted from the elites to the creative class with probability one. There are three groups in our region: workers, creative class members, and the elites. Unlike previous studies, tax policy in our region is set not by the elites but instead by the creative class. In this setting, we first present a counterintuitive result in which the creative class prefers to tax itself, and not the elites or the workers, with the tax proceeds being redistributed also to itself via lump-sum transfers. Second, we explain why this counterintuitive result makes sense. Finally, we discuss whether the above counterintuitive result will hold if the proceeds of taxation are redistributed using lump-sum transfers to all the groups in our region and not just to the creative class.

Regional Science Policy & PracticeVol. 17(7)
Rochester Institute of Technology (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.