Effects of water deficit on fruit quality and water productivity of citrus under plastic film mulching in Western Hubei, China
The light reflectance of films A, B, and C increased by 43.7%, 44.6%, and 6.3% respectively on sunny days compared to no mulching. Films A and B exhibited 2.2 times higher reflectivity than film C. Moderate water deficit - Japanese film (M-A) and moderate water deficit - Dupont film(M-B) treatments demonstrated the greatest improvement in citrus quality. Water deficit combined with film mulching resulted in an average increase in WUE of 10.90%-20.35% compared to full irrigation, and 8.96%-16.52% compared to no mulching. Mulching led to an average increase in citrus yield of 3.09%-16.48% compared to no mulching. The interaction between water deficit and film mulching significantly influenced both yield and WUE. From 2019-2021, M-A and M-B treatments yielded the highest citrus production, consistently demonstrating superior performance. Therefore, the better treatments would be a combination of M-A and M-B treatments, which correspond to soil moisture levels of 70% <i>θ<sub>f</sub></i> -80% <i>θ<sub>f</sub></i> during the young fruit period of citrus under mulching with films A and B. This combination was expected to enhance citrus quality, yield, and WUE. The outcome of this study may offer scientific basis and technical support for citrus irrigation management in Western Hubei, China.
Authors
- Zhicang Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-083X)
- Liangjun Fei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6226-0789)
- Zhiguang Dai
- Yun Zhong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6768-4393)
- Shijiang Zhu
- Yalin Wang
- Jian Zeng
- Kun Hao
Institutions
- China Three Gorges University (CN)
- Henan University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Published
- 2025-04-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1498798
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.93