The Right of Exit and its Temporal Limits

Since unqualified approaches prevail in the right of exit, this freedom is vulnerable to free rider abuse. When this occurs in legal proceedings, the legal order is put at risk. Therefore, drawing on cases from Indigenous law, I critique the prevailing views on the right to exit in multiculturalist literature and legal theory. In particular, I focus on Kukathas’s consensualist theory and the criterion of self-ascription, arguing that both provide weak explanations of political obligation. Finally, based on the principle of fair play and critical liberalism, I propose a new model to offer a satisfactory solution to these cases and justify temporal limits on the right to exit. This new model moves away from the characteristic individualism of the liberal approach in the other two theories and reclaims the value of Indigenous law without endorsing essentialist conceptions of culture.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy and Global Affairs
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/pga20254177
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Right of Exit and its Temporal Limits

Bernardo Cantú, Luis Ernesto Prieto Amaro
Philosophy and Global Affairs
European Union Policy and Governance
article

The Right of Exit and its Temporal Limits

Bernardo Cantú, Luis Ernesto Prieto Amaro
article en

Abstract

Since unqualified approaches prevail in the right of exit, this freedom is vulnerable to free rider abuse. When this occurs in legal proceedings, the legal order is put at risk. Therefore, drawing on cases from Indigenous law, I critique the prevailing views on the right to exit in multiculturalist literature and legal theory. In particular, I focus on Kukathas’s consensualist theory and the criterion of self-ascription, arguing that both provide weak explanations of political obligation. Finally, based on the principle of fair play and critical liberalism, I propose a new model to offer a satisfactory solution to these cases and justify temporal limits on the right to exit. This new model moves away from the characteristic individualism of the liberal approach in the other two theories and reclaims the value of Indigenous law without endorsing essentialist conceptions of culture.

Philosophy and Global AffairsVol. 5(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.