Current trends in the surgical management of spontaneous lobar intracerebral hemorrhage in Canada: A nationwide survey

ABSTRACT Background: The Early Minimally Invasive Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ENRICH) trial demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery to treat spontaneous lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) improved functional outcomes. We aimed to explore current management trends for spontaneous lobar ICH in Canada to assess practice patterns and determine whether further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the role of surgical intervention. Methods: Neurologists, neurosurgeons, physiatrists and trainees in these specialties were invited to complete a 16-question survey exploring three areas: (1) current management for spontaneous lobar ICH at their institution, (2) perceived influence of ENRICH on their practice and (3) perceived need for additional clinical trial data. Standard descriptive statistics were used to report categorical variables. The χ 2 test was used to compare responses across specialties and career stages. Results: The survey was sent to 433 physicians, and 101 (23.3%) responded. Sixty-eight percent of participants reported that prior to publication of the ENRICH trial, spontaneous lobar ICH was primarily managed conservatively, with surgery reserved for life-threatening situations. Forty-three percent of participants did not foresee a significant increase in surgical intervention at their institution. Of neurosurgical respondents, 33% remained hesitant to offer surgical intervention beyond lifesaving operations. Only 5% reported routinely using specifically designed technologies to evacuate ICH. Seventy percent reported that another randomized controlled trial comparing nonsurgical to surgical management for spontaneous lobar ICH is needed. Conclusions: There is significant practice variability in the management of spontaneous lobar ICH across Canadian institutions, stressing the need for additional clinical trial data to determine the role of surgical intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.60
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current trends in the surgical management of spontaneous lobar intracerebral hemorrhage in Canada: A nationwide survey

Catherine Veilleux, Richard Jackson Bransford, Tristan Brunette‐Clément, Alexander D. Rebchuk et al.
2 citations
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
2.78
article

Current trends in the surgical management of spontaneous lobar intracerebral hemorrhage in Canada: A nationwide survey

Catherine Veilleux, Richard Jackson Bransford, Tristan Brunette‐Clément, Alexander D. Rebchuk, Sanju Lama, Andrew Ajisebutu, Braeden D. Newton, Garnette R. Sutherland, Matthew E. Eagles, William K. Diprose, Jenna Smith‐Forrester, Michael D. Hill, Andrew M. Demchuk, Anne-Marie Langlois
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: The Early Minimally Invasive Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ENRICH) trial demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery to treat spontaneous lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) improved functional outcomes. We aimed to explore current management trends for spontaneous lobar ICH in Canada to assess practice patterns and determine whether further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the role of surgical intervention. Methods: Neurologists, neurosurgeons, physiatrists and trainees in these specialties were invited to complete a 16-question survey exploring three areas: (1) current management for spontaneous lobar ICH at their institution, (2) perceived influence of ENRICH on their practice and (3) perceived need for additional clinical trial data. Standard descriptive statistics were used to report categorical variables. The χ 2 test was used to compare responses across specialties and career stages. Results: The survey was sent to 433 physicians, and 101 (23.3%) responded. Sixty-eight percent of participants reported that prior to publication of the ENRICH trial, spontaneous lobar ICH was primarily managed conservatively, with surgery reserved for life-threatening situations. Forty-three percent of participants did not foresee a significant increase in surgical intervention at their institution. Of neurosurgical respondents, 33% remained hesitant to offer surgical intervention beyond lifesaving operations. Only 5% reported routinely using specifically designed technologies to evacuate ICH. Seventy percent reported that another randomized controlled trial comparing nonsurgical to surgical management for spontaneous lobar ICH is needed. Conclusions: There is significant practice variability in the management of spontaneous lobar ICH across Canadian institutions, stressing the need for additional clinical trial data to determine the role of surgical intervention.

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesVol. 53(1)
Dalhousie University (CA), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Auckland (NZ), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Manitoba (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.