Teaching research integrity: a manual of good practices: an outline

Abstract This article addresses the critical need for effective teaching strategies in research integrity (RI), acknowledging widespread uncertainty among educators on the best approach. Building on existing literature, the authors advocate for an ethics-inclusive perspective in RI courses, emphasizing the importance of understanding the ethical dimensions of research practice beyond mere regulatory compliance. In the main article, this dimension of RI training is discussed in detail with regard to ethics. In an abstract we provide a ready-to-use manual of how to implement this in research integrity training. The structure of the article includes a discussion of the ethical foundation of RI. The Appendix introduces a practical, tested course package designed to assist educators, particularly those without specialized ethics training, in developing meaningful RI courses. This includes a detailed overview of the course content, and practical guidance for implementation, aiming to equip educators with the tools necessary to navigate the complexities of teaching research integrity. The focus is on PhD students (but nothing is suggesting that the contents of the article and the Appendix, cannot be used for teaching research integrity on other levels), with the hope that the NERQ community’s shared experiences will contribute significantly to advancing RI education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Educational Integrity
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-025-00186-7
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching research integrity: a manual of good practices: an outline

Muhammad Asaduzzaman, Julia Prieß-Buchheit, Ron Iphofen, Agnieszka Dwojak-Matras et al.
3 citations
International Journal for Educational Integrity
Academic integrity and plagiarism
7.10
article

Teaching research integrity: a manual of good practices: an outline

Muhammad Asaduzzaman, Julia Prieß-Buchheit, Ron Iphofen, Agnieszka Dwojak-Matras, Håkan Salwén, F Blom, Mariëtte van den Hoven, Dragana Ignjatovic Ristic, Cyril Holm, Gerald Achermann, Lucianne Groenink, Bernadette Gruber
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article addresses the critical need for effective teaching strategies in research integrity (RI), acknowledging widespread uncertainty among educators on the best approach. Building on existing literature, the authors advocate for an ethics-inclusive perspective in RI courses, emphasizing the importance of understanding the ethical dimensions of research practice beyond mere regulatory compliance. In the main article, this dimension of RI training is discussed in detail with regard to ethics. In an abstract we provide a ready-to-use manual of how to implement this in research integrity training. The structure of the article includes a discussion of the ethical foundation of RI. The Appendix introduces a practical, tested course package designed to assist educators, particularly those without specialized ethics training, in developing meaningful RI courses. This includes a detailed overview of the course content, and practical guidance for implementation, aiming to equip educators with the tools necessary to navigate the complexities of teaching research integrity. The focus is on PhD students (but nothing is suggesting that the contents of the article and the Appendix, cannot be used for teaching research integrity on other levels), with the hope that the NERQ community’s shared experiences will contribute significantly to advancing RI education.

International Journal for Educational IntegrityVol. 21(1)
Berliner Hochschule für Technik (DE), European Union (BE), University of Kragujevac (RS), Stockholm University (SE), University of Oslo (NO), Utrecht University (NL), Educational Research Institute (PL), Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Kiel (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Karlstad University (SE)
Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
7.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.