Impact of problem-based learning on critical thinking: An exploration with middle school students

Critical thinking is a fundamental skill in 21st-century education, enabling students to analyze information, evaluate evidence, and make informed decisions. Traditional teaching methods often fail to effectively foster critical thinking. Problem-Based Learning (PBL) has been identified as a promising pedagogical approach for enhancing students' critical thinking by engaging them in real-world problem-solving activities. However, empirical research on its effectiveness in middle school students remains limited. This study examined the impact of PBL on the development of critical thinking skills among middle school students. Specifically, it investigates (1) how PBL influences critical thinking, (2) the differences in critical thinking skills between PBL and traditional instruction, and (3) the validity of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) in assessing middle school students in a PBL context. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 240 ninth-grade students divided into experimental (PBL-based) and control (traditional instruction) groups. Critical thinking skills, including inference, assumption recognition, deduction, interpretation, and argument evaluation, were measured using WGCTA. The data analysis involved Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Pearson correlation, and radar chart visualization. Students in the PBL group significantly outperformed those in the control group on all critical thinking dimensions. The most significant gains were observed in the inference, deduction, and evaluation of arguments. The CFA results confirmed the reliability and validity of the WGCTA for middle school students (CFI = 0.994, RMSEA = 0.020). This study highlights PBL as an effective method for enhancing critical thinking among middle school students. These findings support the integration of structured PBL strategies into curriculum design to improve students' analytical and problem-solving skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.5819
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of problem-based learning on critical thinking: An exploration with middle school students

Le Chi Nguyện, Van Hung, Nguyen Ngoc, Nguyen Van Ngọ
2 citations
International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies
Education and Critical Thinking Development
17.85
article

Impact of problem-based learning on critical thinking: An exploration with middle school students

Le Chi Nguyện, Van Hung, Nguyen Ngoc, Nguyen Van Ngọ
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Critical thinking is a fundamental skill in 21st-century education, enabling students to analyze information, evaluate evidence, and make informed decisions. Traditional teaching methods often fail to effectively foster critical thinking. Problem-Based Learning (PBL) has been identified as a promising pedagogical approach for enhancing students' critical thinking by engaging them in real-world problem-solving activities. However, empirical research on its effectiveness in middle school students remains limited. This study examined the impact of PBL on the development of critical thinking skills among middle school students. Specifically, it investigates (1) how PBL influences critical thinking, (2) the differences in critical thinking skills between PBL and traditional instruction, and (3) the validity of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) in assessing middle school students in a PBL context. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 240 ninth-grade students divided into experimental (PBL-based) and control (traditional instruction) groups. Critical thinking skills, including inference, assumption recognition, deduction, interpretation, and argument evaluation, were measured using WGCTA. The data analysis involved Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Pearson correlation, and radar chart visualization. Students in the PBL group significantly outperformed those in the control group on all critical thinking dimensions. The most significant gains were observed in the inference, deduction, and evaluation of arguments. The CFA results confirmed the reliability and validity of the WGCTA for middle school students (CFI = 0.994, RMSEA = 0.020). This study highlights PBL as an effective method for enhancing critical thinking among middle school students. These findings support the integration of structured PBL strategies into curriculum design to improve students' analytical and problem-solving skills.

International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific StudiesVol. 8(2)
VNU University of Science (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.