Ether Machines: Raoul Hausman's Optophonetic Media

In one of the last texts that the Berlin Dadaist Raoul Hausmann published before he left Germany in 1933, ‘Trommelfeuer der Wissenschaft’/Drumfire of Science’, he strongly rejected Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity and promoted the cosmological model of the Austrian engineer Hanns Hörbiger who, in his Glacial Cosmogony, explained cosmic processes based on an interaction of ice and fire in the universe.1 Hausmann’s polemic shows that the artistic avant-garde of the Weimar period was not always in tandem with the scientific avant-garde of the time. In fact, Hausmann’s main aesthetic project, which he called Optophonetics, also stood in stark contrast to Einstein’s revolutionary insights, because it was connected to a theory of the ether. In the nineteenth century, ether was assumed as the medium in which light and electromagnetic waves would propagate — a hypothesis that was rejected by the theory of relativity. However, the ether and its connection to electromagnetic fields, X-rays, and notions of multidimensional spaces fuelled the imagination of many modernist artists. Linda Henderson showed that painters such as Boccioni, Kupka and Kandinsky were inspired by the ether as a phenomenon that stood at the intersection of scientific and occult understandings of mediality. For these artists, aesthetic expression had the task to display the ethereal, electromagnetic, and multidimensional structure of the world that was not yet accessible to human perception.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Media Design
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/cmd.2024.22640
Primary Topic
Art, Technology, and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ether Machines: Raoul Hausman's Optophonetic Media

Arndt Niebisch
Communications Media Design
Art, Technology, and Culture
article

Ether Machines: Raoul Hausman's Optophonetic Media

Arndt Niebisch
article en

Abstract

In one of the last texts that the Berlin Dadaist Raoul Hausmann published before he left Germany in 1933, ‘Trommelfeuer der Wissenschaft’/Drumfire of Science’, he strongly rejected Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity and promoted the cosmological model of the Austrian engineer Hanns Hörbiger who, in his Glacial Cosmogony, explained cosmic processes based on an interaction of ice and fire in the universe.1 Hausmann’s polemic shows that the artistic avant-garde of the Weimar period was not always in tandem with the scientific avant-garde of the time. In fact, Hausmann’s main aesthetic project, which he called Optophonetics, also stood in stark contrast to Einstein’s revolutionary insights, because it was connected to a theory of the ether. In the nineteenth century, ether was assumed as the medium in which light and electromagnetic waves would propagate — a hypothesis that was rejected by the theory of relativity. However, the ether and its connection to electromagnetic fields, X-rays, and notions of multidimensional spaces fuelled the imagination of many modernist artists. Linda Henderson showed that painters such as Boccioni, Kupka and Kandinsky were inspired by the ether as a phenomenon that stood at the intersection of scientific and occult understandings of mediality. For these artists, aesthetic expression had the task to display the ethereal, electromagnetic, and multidimensional structure of the world that was not yet accessible to human perception.

Communications Media DesignVol. 9(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Art, Technology, and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.