WDE: Elegantly Forecasting Power Load through Advanced Signal Refinement and Graceful Normalization Approach

The purpose of this paper is to explore the application of large language models (LLMs) in legalcase retrieval and to evaluate their potential for providing legal professionals with more efffcientwork aids. Currently, although pre-trained models have made great progress in legal case retrieval, they are often limited to speciffc types of laws (e.g., criminal law, civil law, etc.) and lackthe ability to generalize across different types of laws. Moreover, most models can only dealwith a single task, whereas the legal case retrieval task requires a model to have a superb comprehension of legal texts, involving multiple subtasks and requiring multitasking capabilities.Therefore, the large language model, which has super generalization ability and multitaskingability, can solve the above problems.In order to explore the application of large language models for legal case retrieval in the legal domain, this paper evaluates a series of emerging largelanguage models, including multilingual models, homegrown large models, and models speciffcally designed for the legal domain. These models are employed to address legal case retrievaland its associated subtasks. Based on the Supreme People’s Court’s deffnition, the legal caseretrieval task is broken down into seven subtasks: event detection, fact generation, trigger wordextraction, keywords extraction, summarization, dispute focus identiffcation, and reasoning generation. Using a range of evaluation metrics, the experiments demonstrated that these emergingmodels have signiffcant potential in the ffeld of legal case retrieval, even with few-shot samples.The research in this paper not only introduces new ideas in the ffeld of legal case retrievalbut also empirically veriffes the potential of LLMs to improve the quality and efffciency of retrieval. It proves the value of large language models in this ffeld and is expected to signiffcantlyenhance the efffciency of legal practitioners, as well as promote the consistency and fairness oflegal judgments through the use of emerging technologies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Data Intelligence
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3724/2096-7004.di.2025.0015
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WDE: Elegantly Forecasting Power Load through Advanced Signal Refinement and Graceful Normalization Approach

Yiwen Wang
Data Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

WDE: Elegantly Forecasting Power Load through Advanced Signal Refinement and Graceful Normalization Approach

Yiwen Wang
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the application of large language models (LLMs) in legalcase retrieval and to evaluate their potential for providing legal professionals with more efffcientwork aids. Currently, although pre-trained models have made great progress in legal case retrieval, they are often limited to speciffc types of laws (e.g., criminal law, civil law, etc.) and lackthe ability to generalize across different types of laws. Moreover, most models can only dealwith a single task, whereas the legal case retrieval task requires a model to have a superb comprehension of legal texts, involving multiple subtasks and requiring multitasking capabilities.Therefore, the large language model, which has super generalization ability and multitaskingability, can solve the above problems.In order to explore the application of large language models for legal case retrieval in the legal domain, this paper evaluates a series of emerging largelanguage models, including multilingual models, homegrown large models, and models speciffcally designed for the legal domain. These models are employed to address legal case retrievaland its associated subtasks. Based on the Supreme People’s Court’s deffnition, the legal caseretrieval task is broken down into seven subtasks: event detection, fact generation, trigger wordextraction, keywords extraction, summarization, dispute focus identiffcation, and reasoning generation. Using a range of evaluation metrics, the experiments demonstrated that these emergingmodels have signiffcant potential in the ffeld of legal case retrieval, even with few-shot samples.The research in this paper not only introduces new ideas in the ffeld of legal case retrievalbut also empirically veriffes the potential of LLMs to improve the quality and efffciency of retrieval. It proves the value of large language models in this ffeld and is expected to signiffcantlyenhance the efffciency of legal practitioners, as well as promote the consistency and fairness oflegal judgments through the use of emerging technologies.

Data Intelligence
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.