The great debate: UX vs. usability. Which indicators are relevant to measure the success of information systems in higher education

The efficacy of information systems in higher education (HE) is a crucial aspect in an increasingly competitive educational landscape. The rise of digital transformation has heightened the need for measuring the success of non-teaching-related digital services. The Z generation of students presents a unique set of requirements and expectations that must be considered in the success measurement. To align with this contemporary context, it is necessary to revise existing indicators for measuring the success of information systems. The construct of UX holds exceptional importance and is often overlooked, particularly the relationship between UX and usability. To address these gaps, a research study was conducted and the card sorting method with Human- Computer Interaction and HE experts was utilised. The indicators were validated and an instrument was developed, confirming the significance of UX and quality dimension constructs. The study also identified several avenues for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtel.2025.145314
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The great debate: UX vs. usability. Which indicators are relevant to measure the success of information systems in higher education

Mario Jadrić, Tea Mijač, Maja Ćukušić
International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning
Online and Blended Learning
article

The great debate: UX vs. usability. Which indicators are relevant to measure the success of information systems in higher education

Mario Jadrić, Tea Mijač, Maja Ćukušić
article en

Abstract

The efficacy of information systems in higher education (HE) is a crucial aspect in an increasingly competitive educational landscape. The rise of digital transformation has heightened the need for measuring the success of non-teaching-related digital services. The Z generation of students presents a unique set of requirements and expectations that must be considered in the success measurement. To align with this contemporary context, it is necessary to revise existing indicators for measuring the success of information systems. The construct of UX holds exceptional importance and is often overlooked, particularly the relationship between UX and usability. To address these gaps, a research study was conducted and the card sorting method with Human- Computer Interaction and HE experts was utilised. The indicators were validated and an instrument was developed, confirming the significance of UX and quality dimension constructs. The study also identified several avenues for future research.

International Journal of Technology Enhanced LearningVol. 17(2)
University of Split (HR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.