New methodology for extracting pesticides from hair samples for subsequent chromatographic analysis

The use of pesticides poses significant risks to both the environment and public health, particularly impacting farmers who are directly exposed during their daily activities. Therefore, it is crucial to develop methodologies that accurately assess this exposure to safely quantify the levels of pesticides to which the population is subjected. In this context, hair has proven to be an effective biological matrix, as it offers long-term stability of pesticide residues and allows for quick sample collection. This study aims to develop a rapid and safe extraction method for pesticide analysis in hair samples. The sample preparation process has been streamlined into three steps: washing, chopping, and simultaneous grinding/extraction. Validation results confirmed the reliability and robustness of the extraction method for 51 multiclass pesticide compounds, with quantification limits ranging from 0.61 to 20.67 pg mg<sup>-1</sup>. Analysis of variance demonstrated that the method is both selective and linear, with a coefficient of determination exceeding 0.99. Recovery rates were satisfactory, ranging from 87.8% to 110.7%, and good repeatability was observed (RSD < 20%). The analysis of 121 real samples validated the functionality of the method, as at least one pesticide was detected in 100% of the samples analyzed. Azoxystrobin was the most frequently detected pesticide, appearing in 92.56% of the samples at concentrations of up to 3075.22 ± 1.44 pg mg<sup>-1</sup>, followed by carbendazim (65.29%) and tebuconazole (43.80%). Thus, the developed method proves to be effective for the extraction and quantification of various pesticide classes, making it a valuable tool for assessing both direct and indirect exposure among farmers and the general population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analytical Methods
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ay01792g
Primary Topic
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New methodology for extracting pesticides from hair samples for subsequent chromatographic analysis

Luana Conte Crocoli, Sidnei Moura, Rafael Menck de Almeida, Taiza Fontana Cappeletti et al.
Analytical Methods
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
article

New methodology for extracting pesticides from hair samples for subsequent chromatographic analysis

Luana Conte Crocoli, Sidnei Moura, Rafael Menck de Almeida, Taiza Fontana Cappeletti, Erica Somensi Vescovi
article en

Abstract

The use of pesticides poses significant risks to both the environment and public health, particularly impacting farmers who are directly exposed during their daily activities. Therefore, it is crucial to develop methodologies that accurately assess this exposure to safely quantify the levels of pesticides to which the population is subjected. In this context, hair has proven to be an effective biological matrix, as it offers long-term stability of pesticide residues and allows for quick sample collection. This study aims to develop a rapid and safe extraction method for pesticide analysis in hair samples. The sample preparation process has been streamlined into three steps: washing, chopping, and simultaneous grinding/extraction. Validation results confirmed the reliability and robustness of the extraction method for 51 multiclass pesticide compounds, with quantification limits ranging from 0.61 to 20.67 pg mg<sup>-1</sup>. Analysis of variance demonstrated that the method is both selective and linear, with a coefficient of determination exceeding 0.99. Recovery rates were satisfactory, ranging from 87.8% to 110.7%, and good repeatability was observed (RSD < 20%). The analysis of 121 real samples validated the functionality of the method, as at least one pesticide was detected in 100% of the samples analyzed. Azoxystrobin was the most frequently detected pesticide, appearing in 92.56% of the samples at concentrations of up to 3075.22 ± 1.44 pg mg<sup>-1</sup>, followed by carbendazim (65.29%) and tebuconazole (43.80%). Thus, the developed method proves to be effective for the extraction and quantification of various pesticide classes, making it a valuable tool for assessing both direct and indirect exposure among farmers and the general population.

Analytical MethodsVol. 17(16)
Universidade de Caxias do Sul (BR), Universidade de Sorocaba (BR), Synthetic Genomics (United States) (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.