Zainteresowanie dziełami Mikołaja Volckmara do pierwszej połowy XX wieku

Nicolaus Volckmar (16th/17th century) developed didactic books for learning Polish, including grammar, a dictionary and phrasebooks which serve as valuable sources for understanding the past (linguistic, social, etc.). The article outlines the initial phases of incorporating Volckmar into philological discourse. Various types of publications from before the mid-20th century were scrutinized in order to assess how contemporary authors utilized and evaluated Volckmar’s works. It was noted that Volckmar remained underrated for a long time, possibly due to criticisms from Grzegorz Knapski and Jan Wojna, echoed uncritically by later scholars, and due to a reluctance to acknowledge the German’s contribution to the development of the Polish language. This negative narrative persisted in textbooks on the history of the Polish language and lexicography. Władysław Pniewski’s publication was the first to cast Volckmar in a positive light, leading to increased interest in his legacy in detailed research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Językoznawcza
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/pspsj.2024.31.2.9
Primary Topic
Language and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zainteresowanie dziełami Mikołaja Volckmara do pierwszej połowy XX wieku

Anna Lenartowicz-Zagrodna
Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Językoznawcza
Language and Culture
article

Zainteresowanie dziełami Mikołaja Volckmara do pierwszej połowy XX wieku

Anna Lenartowicz-Zagrodna
article en

Abstract

Nicolaus Volckmar (16th/17th century) developed didactic books for learning Polish, including grammar, a dictionary and phrasebooks which serve as valuable sources for understanding the past (linguistic, social, etc.). The article outlines the initial phases of incorporating Volckmar into philological discourse. Various types of publications from before the mid-20th century were scrutinized in order to assess how contemporary authors utilized and evaluated Volckmar’s works. It was noted that Volckmar remained underrated for a long time, possibly due to criticisms from Grzegorz Knapski and Jan Wojna, echoed uncritically by later scholars, and due to a reluctance to acknowledge the German’s contribution to the development of the Polish language. This negative narrative persisted in textbooks on the history of the Polish language and lexicography. Władysław Pniewski’s publication was the first to cast Volckmar in a positive light, leading to increased interest in his legacy in detailed research.

Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria JęzykoznawczaVol. 31(2)
University of Łódź (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Language and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Zainteresowanie dziełami Mikołaja Volckmara do pierwszej połowy XX wieku — Anna Lenartowicz-Zagrodna · Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Językoznawcza (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS