Further Evidence for Awareness of Implicit Attitudes: Accurate Prediction of Implicit Evaluations Extends Across Different Implicit Measures and Different Prediction Tasks

Calling into question the pervasive assumption that people lack awareness of their own implicit evaluations, a growing body of research has demonstrated that people are quite accurate when predicting how they will perform on implicit measures. However, given both the theoretical and practical implications of understanding the extent to which people are aware of the cognitions reflected on implicit measures, it is crucial to examine the generality of this finding. Across four studies using two different measures of implicit evaluations, two different prediction tasks, and multiple target categories, we replicated the key finding that people are quite accurate in predicting their performance on implicit measures. Combining these results with those from existing work strongly suggests that people's ability to accurately predict their performance on implicit measures is not simply an artifact of the particular measure used to tap implicit evaluations or the particular way in which predictions are assessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251328064
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Further Evidence for Awareness of Implicit Attitudes: Accurate Prediction of Implicit Evaluations Extends Across Different Implicit Measures and Different Prediction Tasks

Stephan Fuchs, Michael R. Andreychik
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Further Evidence for Awareness of Implicit Attitudes: Accurate Prediction of Implicit Evaluations Extends Across Different Implicit Measures and Different Prediction Tasks

Stephan Fuchs, Michael R. Andreychik
article en

Abstract

Calling into question the pervasive assumption that people lack awareness of their own implicit evaluations, a growing body of research has demonstrated that people are quite accurate when predicting how they will perform on implicit measures. However, given both the theoretical and practical implications of understanding the extent to which people are aware of the cognitions reflected on implicit measures, it is crucial to examine the generality of this finding. Across four studies using two different measures of implicit evaluations, two different prediction tasks, and multiple target categories, we replicated the key finding that people are quite accurate in predicting their performance on implicit measures. Combining these results with those from existing work strongly suggests that people's ability to accurately predict their performance on implicit measures is not simply an artifact of the particular measure used to tap implicit evaluations or the particular way in which predictions are assessed.

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Fairfield University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.