“So, This Is Actually Going to Somebody, Right?”: Critical Reflections on Participatory Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Peer Support Group for Parents From Historically Marginalized Communities

Community-engaged, participatory approaches to designing and evaluating public health initiatives center the experiences, perspectives, and knowledge of community members at every stage of the process. A peer support group for racialized and minoritized parents under 25 years of age in the northeastern United States was designed, facilitated, and evaluated with the participation of peer leaders who shared expertise and strategies for navigating complex albeit imperfect bureaucratic systems on which they depend for social services. This paper explores key tensions between the experiences and expectations of peer leaders and the academic researchers involved in the project, and examines the limitations of culturally responsive evaluation to address the structural constraints of the neoliberal university.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251320521
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“So, This Is Actually Going to Somebody, Right?”: Critical Reflections on Participatory Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Peer Support Group for Parents From Historically Marginalized Communities

Elizabeth Salerno Valdez, Alba Idaly Muñoz Sánchez, Camille Collins Lovell, Aline Gubrium et al.
1 citations
Qualitative Health Research
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
article

“So, This Is Actually Going to Somebody, Right?”: Critical Reflections on Participatory Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Peer Support Group for Parents From Historically Marginalized Communities

Elizabeth Salerno Valdez, Alba Idaly Muñoz Sánchez, Camille Collins Lovell, Aline Gubrium, J. Robert Smyth, A. Richard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Community-engaged, participatory approaches to designing and evaluating public health initiatives center the experiences, perspectives, and knowledge of community members at every stage of the process. A peer support group for racialized and minoritized parents under 25 years of age in the northeastern United States was designed, facilitated, and evaluated with the participation of peer leaders who shared expertise and strategies for navigating complex albeit imperfect bureaucratic systems on which they depend for social services. This paper explores key tensions between the experiences and expectations of peer leaders and the academic researchers involved in the project, and examines the limitations of culturally responsive evaluation to address the structural constraints of the neoliberal university.

Qualitative Health ResearchVol. 35(4-5)
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Drexel University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Health Policy Implementation Science
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“So, This Is Actually Going to Somebody, Right?”: Critical Reflections on Participatory Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Peer Support Group for Parents From Historically Marginalized Communities — Elizabeth Salerno Valdez, Alba Idaly Muñoz Sánchez, et al. · Qualitative Health Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS