Social Philosophy and Science: Causality, Patterns, and Invariants of Social Development (“Round Table” Materials)

In June 2024, the “round table” “Social Philosophy and Science: Causality, Pat­terns, and Invariants of Social Development” was held at the Faculty of Philoso­phy of Lomonosov Moscow State University. The event was organized by the Fa­culty of Philosophy of Moscow State University, the journal Voprosy Filosofii, and participants of the research project “Analysis of Social Causality and Invari­ants of Social Development as a Method for Overcoming the Fragmentation of Socio-Philosophical Knowledge”, supported by the Russian Science Founda­tion. The following questions were proposed for discussion: 1) What is the episte­mological status of contemporary social philosophy? 2) Social philosophy – so­cial theory – sociology: issues of correlation; 3) What are the causes of the crisis of fragmentation in social philosophy, and how can it be overcome? 4) What are the criteria for a “good social theory”? 5) What are the possible forms of interdis­ciplinary collaborations in modern social research? The core of the discussion was the problem of the high fragmentation of socio-philosophical knowledge and the discussion of possible ways to overcome it (particularly focusing on the intel­lectual resources of systemic-communicative theory as the most “economical” approach). The speakers highlighted the diversity of methodological approaches in contemporary social research and discussed the search for possible ways of ef­fective interdisciplinary interaction in the absence of a stable consensus regard­ing the conceptual status of social philosophy. Drawing on historical experiences of discussing relevant issues, the participants demonstrated that one way to over­come the crisis is the concretization of social realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Voprosy filosofii
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-11-74-98
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Philosophy and Science: Causality, Patterns, and Invariants of Social Development (“Round Table” Materials)

Karen Momdzhyan, T. Shchedrina, Denis Podvoyskiy, I. V. Golubev et al.
Voprosy filosofii
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Social Philosophy and Science: Causality, Patterns, and Invariants of Social Development (“Round Table” Materials)

Karen Momdzhyan, T. Shchedrina, Denis Podvoyskiy, I. V. Golubev, Victor Levytsky, Alexander Yu. Antonovskiy, Boris I. Pruzhinin, Evgeniy Tsurkan, Natalya N. Pogozhina
article en

Abstract

In June 2024, the “round table” “Social Philosophy and Science: Causality, Pat­terns, and Invariants of Social Development” was held at the Faculty of Philoso­phy of Lomonosov Moscow State University. The event was organized by the Fa­culty of Philosophy of Moscow State University, the journal Voprosy Filosofii, and participants of the research project “Analysis of Social Causality and Invari­ants of Social Development as a Method for Overcoming the Fragmentation of Socio-Philosophical Knowledge”, supported by the Russian Science Founda­tion. The following questions were proposed for discussion: 1) What is the episte­mological status of contemporary social philosophy? 2) Social philosophy – so­cial theory – sociology: issues of correlation; 3) What are the causes of the crisis of fragmentation in social philosophy, and how can it be overcome? 4) What are the criteria for a “good social theory”? 5) What are the possible forms of interdis­ciplinary collaborations in modern social research? The core of the discussion was the problem of the high fragmentation of socio-philosophical knowledge and the discussion of possible ways to overcome it (particularly focusing on the intel­lectual resources of systemic-communicative theory as the most “economical” approach). The speakers highlighted the diversity of methodological approaches in contemporary social research and discussed the search for possible ways of ef­fective interdisciplinary interaction in the absence of a stable consensus regard­ing the conceptual status of social philosophy. Drawing on historical experiences of discussing relevant issues, the participants demonstrated that one way to over­come the crisis is the concretization of social realities.

Voprosy filosofii(11)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Moscow State University (TJ)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.