Evaluation of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner According to the ISO 17123-9 Standard

Currently, the use of terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) for point cloud recording is widespread in the fields of architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC), with dimensional tolerance requirements ranging from a few millimeters to several centimeters. The technical specifications of TLSs define the nominal three-dimensional (3D) point accuracy based on distance. In practice, both the design of the TLS and the proprietary software calculation algorithms are key factors in the competition between manufacturers and are therefore not public. This, together with the multiple determinants of each type of work, makes it difficult to assume those values; so, it becomes necessary to use external models to study TLS error sources and standardized evaluation test procedures to determine and evaluate the precision of a TLS and its measurement uncertainties. In this work, we use the international standard ISO 17123-9 to evaluate a Leica TLS RTC360 scanner. We consider observation distances from 10 to 50 m, and use targets with different sizes and reflectance values measured with a Micro-Hyperspec hyperspectral camera. The results show that the use of optimal materials increases the range of the instrument used to automatically detect targets. Additionally, the uncertainties range between 2.7 and 3.9 mm (distances between 10 and 40 m), reaching values of 7.7 mm when the distance is extended to 50 m. Finally, some recommendations for improving the field procedure of this standard are described, with a focus on the interests of surveyors and highlighting the importance of the type of target used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surveying Engineering
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsued2.sueng-1566
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner According to the ISO 17123-9 Standard

María Eugenia Polo García, Pedro J. Pardo, Alonso Sánchez-Ríos
Journal of Surveying Engineering
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Evaluation of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner According to the ISO 17123-9 Standard

María Eugenia Polo García, Pedro J. Pardo, Alonso Sánchez-Ríos
article en

Abstract

Currently, the use of terrestrial laser scanners (TLSs) for point cloud recording is widespread in the fields of architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC), with dimensional tolerance requirements ranging from a few millimeters to several centimeters. The technical specifications of TLSs define the nominal three-dimensional (3D) point accuracy based on distance. In practice, both the design of the TLS and the proprietary software calculation algorithms are key factors in the competition between manufacturers and are therefore not public. This, together with the multiple determinants of each type of work, makes it difficult to assume those values; so, it becomes necessary to use external models to study TLS error sources and standardized evaluation test procedures to determine and evaluate the precision of a TLS and its measurement uncertainties. In this work, we use the international standard ISO 17123-9 to evaluate a Leica TLS RTC360 scanner. We consider observation distances from 10 to 50 m, and use targets with different sizes and reflectance values measured with a Micro-Hyperspec hyperspectral camera. The results show that the use of optimal materials increases the range of the instrument used to automatically detect targets. Additionally, the uncertainties range between 2.7 and 3.9 mm (distances between 10 and 40 m), reaching values of 7.7 mm when the distance is extended to 50 m. Finally, some recommendations for improving the field procedure of this standard are described, with a focus on the interests of surveyors and highlighting the importance of the type of target used.

Journal of Surveying EngineeringVol. 151(3)
Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.