Predicting Respiratory Disease Mortality Risk Using Open-Source AI on Chest Radiographs in an Asian Health Screening Population

Purpose To assess the prognostic value of an open-source deep learning-based chest radiographs algorithm, CXR-Lung-Risk, for stratifying respiratory disease mortality risk among an Asian health screening population using baseline and follow-up chest radiographs. Materials and Methods This single-center, retrospective study analyzed chest radiographs from individuals who underwent health screenings between January 2004 and June 2018. The CXR-Lung-Risk scores from baseline chest radiographs were externally tested for predicting mortality due to lung disease or lung cancer, using competing risk analysis, with adjustments made for clinical factors. The additional value of these risk scores beyond clinical factors was evaluated using the likelihood ratio test. An exploratory analysis was conducted on the CXR-Lung-Risk trajectory over a 3-year follow-up period for individuals in the highest quartile of baseline respiratory disease mortality risk, using a time-series clustering algorithm. Results Among 36 924 individuals (median age, 58 years [IQR, 53-62 years]; 22 352 male), 264 individuals (0.7%) died of respiratory illness, over a median follow-up period of 11.0 years (IQR, 7.8-12.7 years). CXR-Lung-Risk predicted respiratory disease mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per 5 years: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.76, 2.39; <i>P</i> < .001), offering a prognostic improvement over clinical factors (<i>P</i> < .001). The trajectory analysis identified a subgroup with a continuous increase in CXR-Lung-Risk score, which was associated with poorer outcomes (adjusted HR for respiratory disease mortality: 3.26; 95% CI: 1.20, 8.81; <i>P</i> = .02) compared with the subgroup with a continuous decrease in CXR-Lung-Risk score. Conclusion The open-source CXR-Lung-Risk model predicted respiratory disease mortality in an Asian cohort, enabling a two-layer risk stratification approach through an exploratory longitudinal analysis of baseline and follow-up chest radiographs. <b>Keywords:</b> Conventional Radiography, Thorax, Lung, Mediastinum, Heart, Outcomes Analysis <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Júdice de Mattos Farina and Kuriki in this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240628
Citations
2
Primary Topic
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Respiratory Disease Mortality Risk Using Open-Source AI on Chest Radiographs in an Asian Health Screening Population

Hugo J.W.L. Aerts, Jayoun Kim, Michael T. Lu, Vineet K. Raghu et al.
2 citations
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
2.72
article

Predicting Respiratory Disease Mortality Risk Using Open-Source AI on Chest Radiographs in an Asian Health Screening Population

Hugo J.W.L. Aerts, Jayoun Kim, Michael T. Lu, Vineet K. Raghu, Dongheon Lee, Jong Hyuk Lee, Hyungjin Kim, Jakob Weiss, Seung Ho Choi, Seung Ho Lee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose To assess the prognostic value of an open-source deep learning-based chest radiographs algorithm, CXR-Lung-Risk, for stratifying respiratory disease mortality risk among an Asian health screening population using baseline and follow-up chest radiographs. Materials and Methods This single-center, retrospective study analyzed chest radiographs from individuals who underwent health screenings between January 2004 and June 2018. The CXR-Lung-Risk scores from baseline chest radiographs were externally tested for predicting mortality due to lung disease or lung cancer, using competing risk analysis, with adjustments made for clinical factors. The additional value of these risk scores beyond clinical factors was evaluated using the likelihood ratio test. An exploratory analysis was conducted on the CXR-Lung-Risk trajectory over a 3-year follow-up period for individuals in the highest quartile of baseline respiratory disease mortality risk, using a time-series clustering algorithm. Results Among 36 924 individuals (median age, 58 years [IQR, 53-62 years]; 22 352 male), 264 individuals (0.7%) died of respiratory illness, over a median follow-up period of 11.0 years (IQR, 7.8-12.7 years). CXR-Lung-Risk predicted respiratory disease mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] per 5 years: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.76, 2.39; <i>P</i> < .001), offering a prognostic improvement over clinical factors (<i>P</i> < .001). The trajectory analysis identified a subgroup with a continuous increase in CXR-Lung-Risk score, which was associated with poorer outcomes (adjusted HR for respiratory disease mortality: 3.26; 95% CI: 1.20, 8.81; <i>P</i> = .02) compared with the subgroup with a continuous decrease in CXR-Lung-Risk score. Conclusion The open-source CXR-Lung-Risk model predicted respiratory disease mortality in an Asian cohort, enabling a two-layer risk stratification approach through an exploratory longitudinal analysis of baseline and follow-up chest radiographs. <b>Keywords:</b> Conventional Radiography, Thorax, Lung, Mediastinum, Heart, Outcomes Analysis <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Júdice de Mattos Farina and Kuriki in this issue.

Radiology Artificial IntelligenceVol. 7(3)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Seoul National University (KR), University of Freiburg (DE), Chungnam National University (KR), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), Maastricht University (NL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), Mass General Brigham (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
2.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.