Unsupervised Deep Learning for Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage Detection in Diffuse Glioma Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI

Purpose To develop an unsupervised deep learning framework for generalizable blood-brain barrier leakage detection using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, without requiring pharmacokinetic models and arterial input function estimation. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included data from patients who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI between April 2010 and December 2020. An autoencoder-based anomaly detection approach identified one-dimensional voxel-wise time-series abnormal signals through reconstruction residuals, separating them into residual leakage signals (RLSs) and residual vascular signals. The RLS maps were evaluated and compared with the volume transfer constant (<i>K</i><sup>trans</sup>) using the structural similarity index and correlation coefficient. Generalizability was tested on subsampled data, and isocitrate dehydrogenase (<i>IDH</i>) status classification performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results A total of 274 patients (mean age, 54.4 years ± 14.6 [SD]; 164 male) were included in the study. RLS showed high structural similarity (structural similarity index, 0.91 ± 0.02) and correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.56; <i>P</i> < .001) with <i>K</i><sup>trans</sup>. On subsampled data, RLS maps showed better correlation with RLS values from the original data (0.89 vs 0.72; <i>P</i> < .001), higher peak signal-to-noise ratio (33.09 dB vs 28.94 dB; <i>P</i> < .001), and higher structural similarity index (0.92 vs 0.87; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with <i>K</i><sup>trans</sup> maps. RLS maps also outperformed <i>K</i><sup>trans</sup> maps in predicting <i>IDH</i> mutation status (AUC, 0.87 [95% CI: 0.83, 0.91] vs 0.81 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.85]; <i>P</i> = .02). Conclusion The unsupervised framework effectively detected blood-brain barrier leakage without pharmacokinetic models and arterial input function. <b>Keywords:</b> Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI, Unsupervised Learning, Feature Detection, Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage Detection <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Júdice de Mattos Farina and Kuriki in this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240507
Citations
1
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsupervised Deep Learning for Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage Detection in Diffuse Glioma Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI

Kyu Sung Choi, Jin Wook Chung, Joon Hwan Jang, Inpyeong Hwang et al.
1 citations
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
MRI in cancer diagnosis
1.36
article

Unsupervised Deep Learning for Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage Detection in Diffuse Glioma Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI

Kyu Sung Choi, Jin Wook Chung, Joon Hwan Jang, Inpyeong Hwang, Junhyeok Lee, Hyochul Lee, Seung Hong Choi, Hyeonjin Kim, Jung‐Hyun Park
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose To develop an unsupervised deep learning framework for generalizable blood-brain barrier leakage detection using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, without requiring pharmacokinetic models and arterial input function estimation. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included data from patients who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI between April 2010 and December 2020. An autoencoder-based anomaly detection approach identified one-dimensional voxel-wise time-series abnormal signals through reconstruction residuals, separating them into residual leakage signals (RLSs) and residual vascular signals. The RLS maps were evaluated and compared with the volume transfer constant (<i>K</i><sup>trans</sup>) using the structural similarity index and correlation coefficient. Generalizability was tested on subsampled data, and isocitrate dehydrogenase (<i>IDH</i>) status classification performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results A total of 274 patients (mean age, 54.4 years ± 14.6 [SD]; 164 male) were included in the study. RLS showed high structural similarity (structural similarity index, 0.91 ± 0.02) and correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.56; <i>P</i> < .001) with <i>K</i><sup>trans</sup>. On subsampled data, RLS maps showed better correlation with RLS values from the original data (0.89 vs 0.72; <i>P</i> < .001), higher peak signal-to-noise ratio (33.09 dB vs 28.94 dB; <i>P</i> < .001), and higher structural similarity index (0.92 vs 0.87; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with <i>K</i><sup>trans</sup> maps. RLS maps also outperformed <i>K</i><sup>trans</sup> maps in predicting <i>IDH</i> mutation status (AUC, 0.87 [95% CI: 0.83, 0.91] vs 0.81 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.85]; <i>P</i> = .02). Conclusion The unsupervised framework effectively detected blood-brain barrier leakage without pharmacokinetic models and arterial input function. <b>Keywords:</b> Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI, Unsupervised Learning, Feature Detection, Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage Detection <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Júdice de Mattos Farina and Kuriki in this issue.

Radiology Artificial IntelligenceVol. 7(3)
Seoul National University (KR), Seoul Metropolitan Government (KR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), SNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center (KR), Institute for Basic Science (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.