Wearable Device versus Polysomnography for the Assessment of Sleep Characteristics in Patients with Sleep Disorders

Objective: To compare sleep efficiency (SE), total sleep time (TST), and sleep stages recorded by a wearable device (WD) and polysomnography (PSG) in Thai patients with sleep disorders. Materials and Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years scheduled for PSG were included in this cross-sectional study. All research subjects completed questionnaires and wore a WD (Fitbit Alta HR®) on the same night they underwent PSG study. The data from the WD were transferred to a mobile phone and analyzed independently of PSG results, which were scored by sleep technicians. Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for the analyses. Results: Data from 55 patients (33 males, 22 females) were analyzed, with four patients excluded due to data errors. The mean differences between WD and PSG for SE (%) and light sleep were 8.4±23.8 and 43.6±26.4, respectively, both statistically significantly (p<0.05). The ICCs for SE and light sleep were -0.03 and -0.04, indicating poor reliability. However, the mean differences for TST, deep sleep, and REM sleep between the two methods were not statistically significant (p>0.05), with ICC values of 0.17, 0.16, and 0.25, respectively, all considered poor correlations. Conclusion: In patients with sleep disorders, sleep characteristics measured by the WD and PSG showed some differences and weak correlations. As technology advances, the accuracy of wearable devices may improve. Further studies are needed to evaluate different devices and populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal/San Sirirat
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v77i4.272562
Primary Topic
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wearable Device versus Polysomnography for the Assessment of Sleep Characteristics in Patients with Sleep Disorders

Sarin Rungmanee, Wish Banhiran, Phawin Keskool, Wattanachai Chotinaiwattarakul et al.
Siriraj Medical Journal/San Sirirat
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
article

Wearable Device versus Polysomnography for the Assessment of Sleep Characteristics in Patients with Sleep Disorders

Sarin Rungmanee, Wish Banhiran, Phawin Keskool, Wattanachai Chotinaiwattarakul, Kankanok Attawiboon
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare sleep efficiency (SE), total sleep time (TST), and sleep stages recorded by a wearable device (WD) and polysomnography (PSG) in Thai patients with sleep disorders. Materials and Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years scheduled for PSG were included in this cross-sectional study. All research subjects completed questionnaires and wore a WD (Fitbit Alta HR®) on the same night they underwent PSG study. The data from the WD were transferred to a mobile phone and analyzed independently of PSG results, which were scored by sleep technicians. Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for the analyses. Results: Data from 55 patients (33 males, 22 females) were analyzed, with four patients excluded due to data errors. The mean differences between WD and PSG for SE (%) and light sleep were 8.4±23.8 and 43.6±26.4, respectively, both statistically significantly (p<0.05). The ICCs for SE and light sleep were -0.03 and -0.04, indicating poor reliability. However, the mean differences for TST, deep sleep, and REM sleep between the two methods were not statistically significant (p>0.05), with ICC values of 0.17, 0.16, and 0.25, respectively, all considered poor correlations. Conclusion: In patients with sleep disorders, sleep characteristics measured by the WD and PSG showed some differences and weak correlations. As technology advances, the accuracy of wearable devices may improve. Further studies are needed to evaluate different devices and populations.

Siriraj Medical Journal/San SiriratVol. 77(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.