Urban Spatial Management and Planning Based on the Interactions Between Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration

Understanding the intricate relationships among ecosystem services (ESs) and clarifying their driving factors are essential prerequisites for establishing effective ecosystem management strategies. Therefore, we plotted the spatial-temporal distribution of five ESs in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) urban agglomeration and analyzed their interactions in terms of trade-offs, synergies, and bundles. We identified the primary drivers impacting ESs and proposed recommendations for urban spatial management and planning. The result revealed that (1) between 2000 and 2020, the supply of soil conservation increased the most, by 52.56%, and habitat quality decreased the most, by 6.92%; (2) four ES pairs were synergies and six ES pairs exhibited trade-offs, with three ES pairs showing decreased synergies and two ES pairs showing increased trade-offs; (3) the main factors influencing the driving forces of ESs were precipitation, cropland area ratio, and forest area ratio; and (4) the spatial-temporal analysis of ES interactions determined that ESs exhibiting decreasing synergies should be prioritized in ecosystem management, suggesting that the spatial planning of ecosystems should be based on ES bundles. Thus, this study provides guidance for regional ecosystem spatial planning and management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071258
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban Spatial Management and Planning Based on the Interactions Between Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration

Jiaxi Cao, Shuhong Wu, Xiaodan Hu, Ying Li et al.
2 citations
Remote Sensing
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
2.21
article

Urban Spatial Management and Planning Based on the Interactions Between Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration

Jiaxi Cao, Shuhong Wu, Xiaodan Hu, Ying Li, Xixi Xu, Yue Hu, Yimeng Yan, Xuening Huang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Understanding the intricate relationships among ecosystem services (ESs) and clarifying their driving factors are essential prerequisites for establishing effective ecosystem management strategies. Therefore, we plotted the spatial-temporal distribution of five ESs in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) urban agglomeration and analyzed their interactions in terms of trade-offs, synergies, and bundles. We identified the primary drivers impacting ESs and proposed recommendations for urban spatial management and planning. The result revealed that (1) between 2000 and 2020, the supply of soil conservation increased the most, by 52.56%, and habitat quality decreased the most, by 6.92%; (2) four ES pairs were synergies and six ES pairs exhibited trade-offs, with three ES pairs showing decreased synergies and two ES pairs showing increased trade-offs; (3) the main factors influencing the driving forces of ESs were precipitation, cropland area ratio, and forest area ratio; and (4) the spatial-temporal analysis of ES interactions determined that ESs exhibiting decreasing synergies should be prioritized in ecosystem management, suggesting that the spatial planning of ecosystems should be based on ES bundles. Thus, this study provides guidance for regional ecosystem spatial planning and management.

Remote SensingVol. 17(7)
Beijing Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.