Deep learning-enabled, computed-tomography-based race- and sex-specific epicardial adipose tissue thresholds for cardiovascular risk stratification

While the volume of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been linked to various conditions and showed a prognostic value of cardiovascular events, an insufficient effort was put into proposing clear, race- and sex-specific thresholds of high-risk and low-risk EAT amounts. Also, previous works focused on the absolute volume of EAT in milliliters, adjusted to the body size of the patients, and none has proposed a relative measure of what is the amount of EAT for a given patient also in reference to the size of the patient’s heart. In this retrospective study, computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) scans from 20,587 patients (58% male; 84% White, 13% Black, 3% Asian) from 6 sites were used. With the previously described deep learning (DL)-based method, EAT values per patient were calculated, and subsequently normalized using either the DL-obtained cardiac volume mask, body size, or both. The association between the percent of EAT in reference to the heart size and incident mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) was evaluated with Cox models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, race, cigarette smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, family history of coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and left ventricle size. In total, 4,133 events were observed over a period of 6-year follow-up. Our analysis showed that when the amount of EAT was normalized jointly for body surface area and heart size, the predictive effect of EAT was diminished (p=0.85). Patients with higher EAT density, however, were more likely to experience death or MI during follow-up (p⪅0.001). These results were also confirmed in an analysis with race- and sex-specific thresholds. Additionally, per-race analysis showed that the density was predictive only for White patients (both when using global, as well as race- and sex-specific thresholds). To conclude, we showed that the previously observed effect of the EAT indexed for body size predicting cardiovascular risk was associated with patients’ cardiac sizes. Nevertheless, in our analysis EAT density was still associated with a 6-year risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, and this effect was significant only for a single race.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3047613
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning-enabled, computed-tomography-based race- and sex-specific epicardial adipose tissue thresholds for cardiovascular risk stratification

Aakash Dhananjay Shanbhag, Mark H. Lemley, Renée P. Bullock-Palmer, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee et al.
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
article

Deep learning-enabled, computed-tomography-based race- and sex-specific epicardial adipose tissue thresholds for cardiovascular risk stratification

Aakash Dhananjay Shanbhag, Mark H. Lemley, Renée P. Bullock-Palmer, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Attila Fehér, Aditya Killekar, Robert J.H. Miller, Albert J. Sinusas, Andrew Jeffrey Einstein, Damini Dey, Paul Kavanagh, Hidesato Fujito, Mikołaj Buchwald, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Stacey Knight, Piotr J. Slomka, Edward Joseph Miller, Wenhao Zhang, Daniel S. Berman, Anna M. Michałowska, Valerie Builoff, Joanna X. Liang
article en

Abstract

While the volume of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has been linked to various conditions and showed a prognostic value of cardiovascular events, an insufficient effort was put into proposing clear, race- and sex-specific thresholds of high-risk and low-risk EAT amounts. Also, previous works focused on the absolute volume of EAT in milliliters, adjusted to the body size of the patients, and none has proposed a relative measure of what is the amount of EAT for a given patient also in reference to the size of the patient’s heart. In this retrospective study, computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) scans from 20,587 patients (58% male; 84% White, 13% Black, 3% Asian) from 6 sites were used. With the previously described deep learning (DL)-based method, EAT values per patient were calculated, and subsequently normalized using either the DL-obtained cardiac volume mask, body size, or both. The association between the percent of EAT in reference to the heart size and incident mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) was evaluated with Cox models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, race, cigarette smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, family history of coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and left ventricle size. In total, 4,133 events were observed over a period of 6-year follow-up. Our analysis showed that when the amount of EAT was normalized jointly for body surface area and heart size, the predictive effect of EAT was diminished (p=0.85). Patients with higher EAT density, however, were more likely to experience death or MI during follow-up (p⪅0.001). These results were also confirmed in an analysis with race- and sex-specific thresholds. Additionally, per-race analysis showed that the density was predictive only for White patients (both when using global, as well as race- and sex-specific thresholds). To conclude, we showed that the previously observed effect of the EAT indexed for body size predicting cardiovascular risk was associated with patients’ cardiac sizes. Nevertheless, in our analysis EAT density was still associated with a 6-year risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, and this effect was significant only for a single race.

Nihon University (JP), University of Southern California (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), University of Calgary (CA), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Intermountain Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center (PL), Ministry of Interior (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.