Patient-reported harm from NHS treatment or care, or the lack of access to care: a cross-sectional survey of general population prevalence, impact and responses
We found that 9.7% of the British general population reported harm by the NHS, a higher rate than reported in two previous surveys. Our study used a broader and more inclusive definition of harm and was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, making comparison to previous surveys challenging. People responded to harm in different ways, such as sharing experiences with others and seeking professional advice and support. Mostly, people who were harmed wanted help to redress the harm or to gain access to the care needed. Low satisfaction with PALS and complaints services may reflect that these services do not always deliver the required support. There is a need to better understand the patient perspective following harm and for further consideration of what a person-centred approach to resolution and recovery might look like.
Authors
- Ray Fitzpatrick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0607-0563)
- Charles A. Vincent (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0270-0222)
- Michele Peters (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0076-5981)
- Helen Hogan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-2093)
- Lavanya Thana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-5549)
- David Cromwell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6516-8125)
- Alastair Gray (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-7278)
- Chris Graham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6410-8171)
- Helen Crocker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-0749)
- Shivali Modha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5588-3603)
Institutions
- Picker Institute Europe (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Published
- 2025-04-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017213
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 10.11