Accuracy of 3D ultrasound in the measurement of thyroid nodules compared to 2D ultrasound

Aim In patients with multinodular goiter, precise identification and measurement of thyroid nodules using traditional 2D ultrasound (US) can be challenging. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of size measurements for thyroid nodules using 3D ultrasound volumes acquired with the PIUR tUS system, comparing results with routine 2D measurements. Methods A total of 273 thyroid nodules identified on routine 2D US were analyzed. Transversal (T), anteroposterior (AP), and longitudinal (cranio-caudal) diameters (L) were measured in both datasets. Linear measurement volumes (LV) were calculated using the formula T × AP × L × 0.524. Volume measurement volumes (VV) from 3D US were obtained directly. Results Eight nodules were not fully covered, and 41 nodules could not be measured by 3D US. Among the remaining 224 nodules, Bland-Altman analysis showed low biases (T: 0.079 mm, AP: -0.526 mm), with high ICCs (T: 0.979, AP: 0.980). For longitudinal diameter, precise measurement was not possible in 35 nodules. In 189 nodules, Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal biases (L: -0.242 mm, LV: -2.415 mm³, VV: 98.607 mm³), with high ICCs (L: 0.961, LV: 0.976, VV: 0.941). ICCs for different echographic characteristics ranged from 0.940 to 0.990, except for hyperechoic nodules (LV: 0.779, VV: 0.797). ICCs indicated high reliability across different nodule outlines: regular (LV: 0.973, VV: 0.974), moderately irregular (LV: 0.960, VV: 0.908), and substantially irregular (LV: 0.974, VV: 0.936). Quantile regression analysis shows that the discrepancy between 2D and 3D ultrasound measurements increases with nodule size, with larger nodules exhibiting greater differences. Conclusion Size measurements of thyroid nodules using 3D ultrasound in routine clinical practice show good agreement with 2D ultrasound measurements, as evidenced by Bland-Altman analysis and ICCs. These findings support the integration of 3D ultrasound into clinical workflows for improved accuracy in thyroid nodule assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3039267
Primary Topic
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of 3D ultrasound in the measurement of thyroid nodules compared to 2D ultrasound

Thomas Wendler, Johannes Petzold, Wolfgang Weber, Martin Krönke et al.
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Accuracy of 3D ultrasound in the measurement of thyroid nodules compared to 2D ultrasound

Thomas Wendler, Johannes Petzold, Wolfgang Weber, Martin Krönke, Christine Eilers, Guodong Li, Francesca De Benetti, Melanie Köhler
article en

Abstract

Aim In patients with multinodular goiter, precise identification and measurement of thyroid nodules using traditional 2D ultrasound (US) can be challenging. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of size measurements for thyroid nodules using 3D ultrasound volumes acquired with the PIUR tUS system, comparing results with routine 2D measurements. Methods A total of 273 thyroid nodules identified on routine 2D US were analyzed. Transversal (T), anteroposterior (AP), and longitudinal (cranio-caudal) diameters (L) were measured in both datasets. Linear measurement volumes (LV) were calculated using the formula T × AP × L × 0.524. Volume measurement volumes (VV) from 3D US were obtained directly. Results Eight nodules were not fully covered, and 41 nodules could not be measured by 3D US. Among the remaining 224 nodules, Bland-Altman analysis showed low biases (T: 0.079 mm, AP: -0.526 mm), with high ICCs (T: 0.979, AP: 0.980). For longitudinal diameter, precise measurement was not possible in 35 nodules. In 189 nodules, Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal biases (L: -0.242 mm, LV: -2.415 mm³, VV: 98.607 mm³), with high ICCs (L: 0.961, LV: 0.976, VV: 0.941). ICCs for different echographic characteristics ranged from 0.940 to 0.990, except for hyperechoic nodules (LV: 0.779, VV: 0.797). ICCs indicated high reliability across different nodule outlines: regular (LV: 0.973, VV: 0.974), moderately irregular (LV: 0.960, VV: 0.908), and substantially irregular (LV: 0.974, VV: 0.936). Quantile regression analysis shows that the discrepancy between 2D and 3D ultrasound measurements increases with nodule size, with larger nodules exhibiting greater differences. Conclusion Size measurements of thyroid nodules using 3D ultrasound in routine clinical practice show good agreement with 2D ultrasound measurements, as evidenced by Bland-Altman analysis and ICCs. These findings support the integration of 3D ultrasound into clinical workflows for improved accuracy in thyroid nodule assessment.

Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.