Evidence-based practice among mental health professionals in Puerto Rico: Attitudes, knowledge, resources, and treatments

The growing prevalence of mental health disorders in Puerto Rico necessitates the use of efficacious mental health interventions, such as Evidence-Based Treatments (EBTs), to promote positive outcomes within this underserved population. This study aimed to describe the use of psychosocial interventions with different levels of evidence for efficacy (i.e., well-established, probably or possibly efficacious, and experimental) among mental health professionals in Puerto Rico (i.e., social workers, psychologists, counselors; N = 237). A quantitative cross-sectional design was employed to analyze data collected between October and December 2021. Chi-square tests of independence were conducted to examine differences in the self-reported use of interventions across professional disciplines and agency types. A significant portion of the sample (71.7%) reported using at least one intervention with well-established evidence. Psychologists most frequently used these well-established interventions in their practice, followed by counselors and social workers. Participants working in private agencies also endorsed higher utilization of various EBTs than those in public agencies. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the correlation between favorable attitudes, knowledge, and training on these practices and the self-reported use of specific interventions. Favorable attitudes towards Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs) were related to increased use of mindfulness therapy, a well-established intervention. Greater knowledge and training on EBTs were found to correlate with self-reported use of interventions with well-established and probably efficacious evidence. Findings suggest that mental health professionals in Puerto Rico use some well-established EBTs, but the modalities used varied based on a variety of factors. Our findings suggest that increasing knowledge and agency training on EBTs may be an effective way to promote the use of interventions with well-established and probably efficacious evidence. Implications for research, practice, education, and policy development in Puerto Rico are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS mental health.
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmen.0000103
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-based practice among mental health professionals in Puerto Rico: Attitudes, knowledge, resources, and treatments

Natalie Rodríguez‐Quintana, Alejandro Vázquez, Natalia Giraldo‐Santiago, Melanie M. Domenech Rodríguez et al.
1 citations
PLOS mental health.
Counseling Practices and Supervision
2.44
article

Evidence-based practice among mental health professionals in Puerto Rico: Attitudes, knowledge, resources, and treatments

Natalie Rodríguez‐Quintana, Alejandro Vázquez, Natalia Giraldo‐Santiago, Melanie M. Domenech Rodríguez, Cynthia M. Navarro Flores, Yoojee Kim, Paul Fericelli-Castillo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The growing prevalence of mental health disorders in Puerto Rico necessitates the use of efficacious mental health interventions, such as Evidence-Based Treatments (EBTs), to promote positive outcomes within this underserved population. This study aimed to describe the use of psychosocial interventions with different levels of evidence for efficacy (i.e., well-established, probably or possibly efficacious, and experimental) among mental health professionals in Puerto Rico (i.e., social workers, psychologists, counselors; N = 237). A quantitative cross-sectional design was employed to analyze data collected between October and December 2021. Chi-square tests of independence were conducted to examine differences in the self-reported use of interventions across professional disciplines and agency types. A significant portion of the sample (71.7%) reported using at least one intervention with well-established evidence. Psychologists most frequently used these well-established interventions in their practice, followed by counselors and social workers. Participants working in private agencies also endorsed higher utilization of various EBTs than those in public agencies. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the correlation between favorable attitudes, knowledge, and training on these practices and the self-reported use of specific interventions. Favorable attitudes towards Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs) were related to increased use of mindfulness therapy, a well-established intervention. Greater knowledge and training on EBTs were found to correlate with self-reported use of interventions with well-established and probably efficacious evidence. Findings suggest that mental health professionals in Puerto Rico use some well-established EBTs, but the modalities used varied based on a variety of factors. Our findings suggest that increasing knowledge and agency training on EBTs may be an effective way to promote the use of interventions with well-established and probably efficacious evidence. Implications for research, practice, education, and policy development in Puerto Rico are discussed.

PLOS mental health.Vol. 2(4)
Utah State University (US), Harvard University (US), InterAmerican University of Puerto Rico (PR), Tides Foundation (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Michigan Medicine (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.