Cultural Practices and cedaw: Epistemic Violence and the Marginalisation of Local Knowledge in International Human Rights Law

Abstract This article explores the realisation of rights for marginalised and disadvantaged women and girls in the Global South, with a particular focus on how the concept of “culture” is framed within international human rights discourse on violence against women ( vaw ). The article focuses on the work of the committee that monitors the major women’s convention, the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women ( cedaw ). cedaw ’s discourse predominantly presents “culture” in negative terms – as a barrier to gender equality that States must work to eliminate. This perspective creates a rigid opposition between “culture” and “rights”, implying an inherent conflict between the two. As a result, those associated with certain cultural identities are further marginalised, reinforcing their status as the “other”. There is a systemic repression of the knowledge of other cultures and the positing of cultural Europeanisation as the only valid framework for addressing vaw . As a key site for the construction of knowledge, communities, and identities, cedaw ’s interpretive framework for addressing vaw needs to be reassessed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Human Rights Law Review
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-14010001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Practices and cedaw: Epistemic Violence and the Marginalisation of Local Knowledge in International Human Rights Law

Julie Ada Tchoukou
1 citations
International Human Rights Law Review
Human Rights and Development
4.20
article

Cultural Practices and cedaw: Epistemic Violence and the Marginalisation of Local Knowledge in International Human Rights Law

Julie Ada Tchoukou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the realisation of rights for marginalised and disadvantaged women and girls in the Global South, with a particular focus on how the concept of “culture” is framed within international human rights discourse on violence against women ( vaw ). The article focuses on the work of the committee that monitors the major women’s convention, the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women ( cedaw ). cedaw ’s discourse predominantly presents “culture” in negative terms – as a barrier to gender equality that States must work to eliminate. This perspective creates a rigid opposition between “culture” and “rights”, implying an inherent conflict between the two. As a result, those associated with certain cultural identities are further marginalised, reinforcing their status as the “other”. There is a systemic repression of the knowledge of other cultures and the positing of cultural Europeanisation as the only valid framework for addressing vaw . As a key site for the construction of knowledge, communities, and identities, cedaw ’s interpretive framework for addressing vaw needs to be reassessed.

International Human Rights Law ReviewVol. 14(1)
University of Ottawa (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Human Rights and Development
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.