Performance Evaluation of Q-Learning-Based List Scheduling Algorithms in Heterogeneous Systems

Task scheduling plays a crucial role in Heterogeneous Systems (HS). The makespan (or scheduling length) minimization is the key criterion of the task scheduling algorithm in HS. Recently, the rapid development of machine learning has led to its widespread application in various fields. This paper extends existing heuristic-based task scheduling algorithms using Reinforcement learning techniques. Moreover, we use the Q-learning technique to extend two heuristic scheduling algorithms, the PEFT and IPPTS. We aim to combine these algorithms with Q-learning to improve their task prioritization. We compare the HEFT, QL-HEFT, QL-PEFT, QL-PPTS, and QL-IPPTS using real-world scientific workflows. The experimental results show that QL-HEFT outperforms QL-PEFT, QL-PPTS, and QL-IPPTS by 27.12 percent, 16.75 percent, and 10.7 percent, respectively

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccc62609.2024.10941813
Primary Topic
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of Q-Learning-Based List Scheduling Algorithms in Heterogeneous Systems

Hamza Djigal, Maryam Cheraghy, Quan Xue
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
article

Performance Evaluation of Q-Learning-Based List Scheduling Algorithms in Heterogeneous Systems

Hamza Djigal, Maryam Cheraghy, Quan Xue
article en

Abstract

Task scheduling plays a crucial role in Heterogeneous Systems (HS). The makespan (or scheduling length) minimization is the key criterion of the task scheduling algorithm in HS. Recently, the rapid development of machine learning has led to its widespread application in various fields. This paper extends existing heuristic-based task scheduling algorithms using Reinforcement learning techniques. Moreover, we use the Q-learning technique to extend two heuristic scheduling algorithms, the PEFT and IPPTS. We aim to combine these algorithms with Q-learning to improve their task prioritization. We compare the HEFT, QL-HEFT, QL-PEFT, QL-PPTS, and QL-IPPTS using real-world scientific workflows. The experimental results show that QL-HEFT outperforms QL-PEFT, QL-PPTS, and QL-IPPTS by 27.12 percent, 16.75 percent, and 10.7 percent, respectively

Wenzhou-Kean University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performance Evaluation of Q-Learning-Based List Scheduling Algorithms in Heterogeneous Systems — Hamza Djigal, Maryam Cheraghy, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS