FGLFA: A Federated Graph Learning-based Cross-Network Layer Feature Alignment Model for Major Depressive Disorder Identification
It is a challenge to centralize medical datasets due to privacy, security, and storage issues for major depressive disorder (MDD). Federated Learning offers a solution for collaborative training without centralized storage. Nonetheless, it often overlooks the issue of data heterogeneity across sites. We propose a Federated Graph Learning-based Cross-Network Layer Feature Alignment (FGLFA) model for MDD identification. Specifically, it trains and tests Graph Sampling and Aggregation (GraphSAGE) networks separately for each site to extract graph-structured features from site-specific data. The GraphSAGE network integrates the residual connections (RCs), thereby mitigating gradient vanishing during model training and accelerating convergence speed. The feature alignment module aligns cross-network layer features across sites to minimize the discrepancies in feature distributions between sites. The experimental results show that the FGLFA model achieves an average ACC of 65.1% and F1-score of 70.9% across three sites. This demonstrates consistent advantages over mainstream federated paradigms, reducing variance by 23%. The proposed method improves the accuracy of MDD identification, and provides a more efficient tool for early diagnosis and treatment of brain diseases.
Authors
- Zhuqing Jiao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6547-8449)
- Zhengwang Xia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6815-5856)
- Yudong Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4870-1493)
- Xinshun Ding
- Chunying Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7110-5374)
Institutions
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Changzhou Institute of Technology (CN)
- Changzhou University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2025.3557094
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.47