Utility-Driven Minimum Cost Consensus Model With Preference Learning and Fairness Concerns

Nowadays the emergence of digital technology and artificial intelligence brings a lot of extra information and convenience for group decision activities, such as rich historical decision data, mobile decision platform, artificial interactive device and others. However, it also results in high complexity and uncertainty of the decision environments, modeling and analysis, and the preference of decision maker is crucial to the design of group decision and consensus mechanism. Meanwhile, the information transparency results in more attention being paid to fairness concerns in group decision making. Based on the historical group decision data, this study proposes a novel minimum cost consensus model with preference learning and fairness concerns (MCCM-PLFC), which characterizes the modification motivation of decision makers in a utility-driven way. A preference learning framework is first proposed to determine the parameters of utility functions of decision makers, where fairness concerns are modeled based on the return bias among the decision makers. Then, in a Stackelberg game consensus framework, the MCCM-PLFC is constructed to minimize the consensus cost of the moderator with consideration of the utility-driven behavior of decision makers. In addition, a best-response update algorithm is designed to solve the equilibrium solution among the decision makers and an adaptive differential evolution algorithm is used to solve the MCCM-PLFC. Finally, a throughout of experimental study is performed to quantify the validity of the proposed consensus model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2025.3552113
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility-Driven Minimum Cost Consensus Model With Preference Learning and Fairness Concerns

Witold Pedrycz, Huang Wenxue, Yucheng Dong, Bowen Zhang
4 citations
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
8.43
article

Utility-Driven Minimum Cost Consensus Model With Preference Learning and Fairness Concerns

Witold Pedrycz, Huang Wenxue, Yucheng Dong, Bowen Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Nowadays the emergence of digital technology and artificial intelligence brings a lot of extra information and convenience for group decision activities, such as rich historical decision data, mobile decision platform, artificial interactive device and others. However, it also results in high complexity and uncertainty of the decision environments, modeling and analysis, and the preference of decision maker is crucial to the design of group decision and consensus mechanism. Meanwhile, the information transparency results in more attention being paid to fairness concerns in group decision making. Based on the historical group decision data, this study proposes a novel minimum cost consensus model with preference learning and fairness concerns (MCCM-PLFC), which characterizes the modification motivation of decision makers in a utility-driven way. A preference learning framework is first proposed to determine the parameters of utility functions of decision makers, where fairness concerns are modeled based on the return bias among the decision makers. Then, in a Stackelberg game consensus framework, the MCCM-PLFC is constructed to minimize the consensus cost of the moderator with consideration of the utility-driven behavior of decision makers. In addition, a best-response update algorithm is designed to solve the equilibrium solution among the decision makers and an adaptive differential evolution algorithm is used to solve the MCCM-PLFC. Finally, a throughout of experimental study is performed to quantify the validity of the proposed consensus model.

IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsVol. 55(7)
Central South University (CN), University of Alberta (CA), Sichuan University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
8.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.