360° Camera Versus Two-View Standard Video Camera Capture of Neonatal Resuscitation: Optimizing Recording for Observation of Resuscitation Steps

Background Fixed-camera video recordings of neonatal resuscitation have been utilized to facilitate post-event debriefing and evaluate guideline adherence. Traditional video capture is limited in the field of view it provides, requiring multiple cameras to capture the relevant steps of the resuscitation. Objective We sought to examine the feasibility of a 360° video camera (360V) (Gear 360, Samsung, Vietnam) compared to a traditional two-view standard video camera (SVC) (SimView Mobile Camera, Laerdal Medical, New York) as a method for recording neonatal resuscitation and capturing salient resuscitation factors. Methods This observational study recorded neonatal resuscitation events in a simulated delivery room. Each simulation was recorded by two methods: near- and far-view SVC and 360V. Two independent reviewers analyzed the videos for visibility of Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) steps, audibility, and recording quality of predefined resuscitation events and behaviors. Global visualization and audibility scores were analyzed using a five-point Likert scale. Results A total of 25 simulated neonatal resuscitation events were reviewed. The average global visualization of NRP steps was higher using 360V than with two-view SVC (4.26 vs. 3.33, P = 0.0001). Average global audibility using 360V was also higher than with two-view SVC (4.90 vs. 4.21, P < 0.0001). Motion sickness more often occurred while viewing 360V videos compared to two-view SVC videos (P < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). However, motion sickness was overall a rare occurrence. Conclusions Average global visualization and audibility were improved using 360V compared to two-view SVC. A 360V is a superior method for reviewing neonatal resuscitation simulations compared to two-view SVC. A limitation of the study is that the location of the SVC in the room may not reflect the ideal placement for capturing visual aspects of neonatal resuscitation. Placement of the camera on the warmer may have yielded different results. Further studies comparing various SVC placements to 360V are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.81625
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

360° Camera Versus Two-View Standard Video Camera Capture of Neonatal Resuscitation: Optimizing Recording for Observation of Resuscitation Steps

Rachel Umoren, Michael Rowe, Taylor Sawyer, Megan M. Gray et al.
Cureus
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

360° Camera Versus Two-View Standard Video Camera Capture of Neonatal Resuscitation: Optimizing Recording for Observation of Resuscitation Steps

Rachel Umoren, Michael Rowe, Taylor Sawyer, Megan M. Gray, Ellie Ficco, Nahee Park
article en

Abstract

Background Fixed-camera video recordings of neonatal resuscitation have been utilized to facilitate post-event debriefing and evaluate guideline adherence. Traditional video capture is limited in the field of view it provides, requiring multiple cameras to capture the relevant steps of the resuscitation. Objective We sought to examine the feasibility of a 360° video camera (360V) (Gear 360, Samsung, Vietnam) compared to a traditional two-view standard video camera (SVC) (SimView Mobile Camera, Laerdal Medical, New York) as a method for recording neonatal resuscitation and capturing salient resuscitation factors. Methods This observational study recorded neonatal resuscitation events in a simulated delivery room. Each simulation was recorded by two methods: near- and far-view SVC and 360V. Two independent reviewers analyzed the videos for visibility of Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) steps, audibility, and recording quality of predefined resuscitation events and behaviors. Global visualization and audibility scores were analyzed using a five-point Likert scale. Results A total of 25 simulated neonatal resuscitation events were reviewed. The average global visualization of NRP steps was higher using 360V than with two-view SVC (4.26 vs. 3.33, P = 0.0001). Average global audibility using 360V was also higher than with two-view SVC (4.90 vs. 4.21, P < 0.0001). Motion sickness more often occurred while viewing 360V videos compared to two-view SVC videos (P < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). However, motion sickness was overall a rare occurrence. Conclusions Average global visualization and audibility were improved using 360V compared to two-view SVC. A 360V is a superior method for reviewing neonatal resuscitation simulations compared to two-view SVC. A limitation of the study is that the location of the SVC in the room may not reflect the ideal placement for capturing visual aspects of neonatal resuscitation. Placement of the camera on the warmer may have yielded different results. Further studies comparing various SVC placements to 360V are warranted.

CureusVol. 17(4)
University of Washington (US), Seattle University (US)
University of Washington, Seattle Children's Research Institute
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.