Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review-Driven Consensus Guideline from the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been universal in the US since 2010; however, there is significant variation among newborn screening algorithms. Systematic reviews were used to develop seven recommendations for newborn screening program practices to improve timeliness, sensitivity, and equity in diagnosing infants with CF: (1) The CF Foundation recommends the use of a floating immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) cutoff over a fixed IRT cutoff; (2) The CF Foundation recommends using a very high IRT referral strategy in CF newborn screening programs whose variant panel does not include all CF-causing variants in CFTR2 or does not have a variant panel that achieves at least 95% sensitivity in all ancestral groups within the state; (3) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening algorithms should not limit <i>CFTR</i> variant detection to the F508del variant or variants included in the American College of Medical Genetics-23 panel; (4) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening programs screen for all CF-causing <i>CFTR</i> variants in CFTR2; (5) The CF Foundation recommends conducting <i>CFTR</i> variant screening twice weekly or more frequently as resources allow; (6) The CF Foundation recommends the inclusion of a <i>CFTR</i> sequencing tier following IRT and <i>CFTR</i> variant panel testing to improve the specificity and positive predictive value of CF newborn screening; (7) The CF Foundation recommends that both the primary care provider and the CF specialist be notified of abnormal newborn screening results. Through implementation, it is anticipated that these recommendations will result in improved sensitivity, equity, and timeliness of CF newborn screening, leading to improved health outcomes for all individuals diagnosed with CF following newborn screening and a decreased burden on families.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020024
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review-Driven Consensus Guideline from the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Cleveland J. White, Karen S. Raraigh, Clement L. Ren, Kathryn Tullis et al.
18 citations
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
27.33
article

Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review-Driven Consensus Guideline from the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Cleveland J. White, Karen S. Raraigh, Clement L. Ren, Kathryn Tullis, Steven D. Hicks, Q. Eileen Wafford, Philip M. Farrell, Marci K. Sontag, Susanna A. McColley, Sarah E. Hempstead, M. Taylor, Meghan E. McGarry, M. Christine Dorley, Albert Faro, Debra Freedenberg, Faith Shropshire, Karey Padding
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been universal in the US since 2010; however, there is significant variation among newborn screening algorithms. Systematic reviews were used to develop seven recommendations for newborn screening program practices to improve timeliness, sensitivity, and equity in diagnosing infants with CF: (1) The CF Foundation recommends the use of a floating immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) cutoff over a fixed IRT cutoff; (2) The CF Foundation recommends using a very high IRT referral strategy in CF newborn screening programs whose variant panel does not include all CF-causing variants in CFTR2 or does not have a variant panel that achieves at least 95% sensitivity in all ancestral groups within the state; (3) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening algorithms should not limit <i>CFTR</i> variant detection to the F508del variant or variants included in the American College of Medical Genetics-23 panel; (4) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening programs screen for all CF-causing <i>CFTR</i> variants in CFTR2; (5) The CF Foundation recommends conducting <i>CFTR</i> variant screening twice weekly or more frequently as resources allow; (6) The CF Foundation recommends the inclusion of a <i>CFTR</i> sequencing tier following IRT and <i>CFTR</i> variant panel testing to improve the specificity and positive predictive value of CF newborn screening; (7) The CF Foundation recommends that both the primary care provider and the CF specialist be notified of abnormal newborn screening results. Through implementation, it is anticipated that these recommendations will result in improved sensitivity, equity, and timeliness of CF newborn screening, leading to improved health outcomes for all individuals diagnosed with CF following newborn screening and a decreased burden on families.

International Journal of Neonatal ScreeningVol. 11(2)
Northwestern University (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), Seattle Children's Hospital (US), Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Texas Department of State Health Services (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Washington (US), Community Foundation (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (US), Maryland Department of Health (US), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
27.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.