Leveraging ultrasonic-derived phenotypes and estimated breeding value to improve abdominal fat weight prediction in chickens throughout the egg laying period

Abdominal fat (AF) in hens impacts egg production and may reflect poor feed efficiency, meaning that dynamic monitor of AF changes facilitate to optimize feeding management and production efficiency. This study estimated hens’ AF weight among whole laying period through fitting vivo phenotypes by ten machine learning techniques (including generalized linear model, GLM; multiple linear regression, MLR; ridge regression, RR; LASSO; elastic net, EN; k nearest neighbours, KNN; SVM biased linear and Gaussian kernel; Random forests, RF and XGBoost). Consistent protocols were applied to all phenotypic measurements to minimize batch effects across five laying stages (8 traits: abdominal fat thickness (AFT), keel length (KL), breast width (BW), pubic bone width (PBW), body slope length (BSL), live weight (LW), keel-pubic length (KPL), and abdominal fat weight (AFW). The stepwise backwards variables selection was conducted to rule out the possible bias of multicollinearity between independent variables and AFW. While, AFT measured by ultrasound improved the predictive ability of all the models (R² of KNN showed highest increase of 12.35 %). Moreover, we also evaluated the contribution of AF estimate breeding values (EBVs) to fitting model performance. When incorporating EBVs of AFW as extra independent variables, all methods’ predictive ability had increased by an average of 15.71 %, especially KNN (27.2 %). For muliple laying periods, the EN model showed the best performance at 26 and 35 weeks, with an average R² of 0.928, MAE of 6.709, RMSE of 9.862, and MAPE of 9.660. The KNN model performed best at 28, 31, and 43 weeks, with an average R² of 0.918, MAE of 9.273, RMSE of 12.348, and MAPE of 17.240. These findings underscore the feasibility of accurately prediction of hens'AF through fitting appropriate algorithms for different laying periods, that supporting delicacy feeding management in farm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Agricultural Technology
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100912
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging ultrasonic-derived phenotypes and estimated breeding value to improve abdominal fat weight prediction in chickens throughout the egg laying period

Guiping Zhao, Jie Wen, Dawei Liu, Zhengda Li et al.
Smart Agricultural Technology
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Leveraging ultrasonic-derived phenotypes and estimated breeding value to improve abdominal fat weight prediction in chickens throughout the egg laying period

Guiping Zhao, Jie Wen, Dawei Liu, Zhengda Li, Penghao Li, Fan Ying, Xianyi Song, Dan Zhu, Bingxing An
article en

Abstract

Abdominal fat (AF) in hens impacts egg production and may reflect poor feed efficiency, meaning that dynamic monitor of AF changes facilitate to optimize feeding management and production efficiency. This study estimated hens’ AF weight among whole laying period through fitting vivo phenotypes by ten machine learning techniques (including generalized linear model, GLM; multiple linear regression, MLR; ridge regression, RR; LASSO; elastic net, EN; k nearest neighbours, KNN; SVM biased linear and Gaussian kernel; Random forests, RF and XGBoost). Consistent protocols were applied to all phenotypic measurements to minimize batch effects across five laying stages (8 traits: abdominal fat thickness (AFT), keel length (KL), breast width (BW), pubic bone width (PBW), body slope length (BSL), live weight (LW), keel-pubic length (KPL), and abdominal fat weight (AFW). The stepwise backwards variables selection was conducted to rule out the possible bias of multicollinearity between independent variables and AFW. While, AFT measured by ultrasound improved the predictive ability of all the models (R² of KNN showed highest increase of 12.35 %). Moreover, we also evaluated the contribution of AF estimate breeding values (EBVs) to fitting model performance. When incorporating EBVs of AFW as extra independent variables, all methods’ predictive ability had increased by an average of 15.71 %, especially KNN (27.2 %). For muliple laying periods, the EN model showed the best performance at 26 and 35 weeks, with an average R² of 0.928, MAE of 6.709, RMSE of 9.862, and MAPE of 9.660. The KNN model performed best at 28, 31, and 43 weeks, with an average R² of 0.918, MAE of 9.273, RMSE of 12.348, and MAPE of 17.240. These findings underscore the feasibility of accurately prediction of hens'AF through fitting appropriate algorithms for different laying periods, that supporting delicacy feeding management in farm.

Smart Agricultural TechnologyVol. 11
Quantitative BioSciences (US)
Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.